Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2016 Aug 11;37(27):2436–2446. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24467

Table 2.

Effects of grid spacing (space) upon the performance of MMPBSA. The testing conditions are the same as those in Table 1 but with all three tested grid spacings of 1.00, 0.50, and 0.25 Angstrom. All calculations were conducted with the new nonpolar solvent model (inp=2), the default SES surface (sasopt=0), the default solvent probe (dprob=1.4), and the default atomic radius option (radiopt=0) as in Table 1. The spacings are in Angstrom (Å). The RMSD’s of ΔΔG are in kcal/mol.

Spacing RMSD R Slope
Median Range Median Range Median Range
0.25 3.26 1.89–4.25 0.61 0.30–0.86 0.30 0.23–0.42
0.50 3.28 1.94–4.26 0.60 0.30–0.86 0.31 0.23–0.42
1.00 3.38 1.98–4.23 0.59 0.29–0.86 0.30 0.21–0.42