Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 22;113(36):10013–10018. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602212113

Table 1.

O:C ratios of the aqSOA measured for SPC2011 and of the OA factors (including the aqSOA) for Bologna2013, together with literature values of laboratory aqSOA and cloud water samples

OA type O:C (AA) O:C (AI) Site Notes Source
Fog water 0.53 (0.08) 0.68 (0.08) SPC Fall 2011 This study
aqSOA event 1 0.61 (0.09) 0.83 (0.10) SPC Fall 2011
aqSOA event 2 0.61 (0.09) 0.84 (0.10) SPC Fall 2011
aqSOA event 3 0.61 (0.09) 0.83 (0.10) SPC Fall 2011
aqSOA event 9 0.62 (0.09) 0.82 (0.10) SPC Fall 2011
HOA 0.08 (0.01) 0.10 (0.01) Bologna Winter 2013 This study
BBOA 0.26 (0.04) 0.33 (0.04) Bologna Winter 2013
OOA1 or aqSOA 0.57 (0.09) 0.81 (0.10) Bologna Winter 2013
OOA2 0.44 (0.07) 0.56 (0.07) Bologna Winter 2013
OOA3 0.66 (0.10) 0.83 (0.10) Bologna Winter 2013
Low-volatility cloud water organics 0.52–0.59 Whistler Ambient Lee et al. (20)
Gas-phase SOA 0.3–0.4 Chamber Aiken et al. (57)
Glyoxal aqSOA 1–1.8 Chamber Lee et al. (14)
Phenols aqSOA 0.85–1.23 Chamber Yu et al. (13)
Phenols aqSOA 0.8–1.06 Chamber Sun et al. (16)

The elemental ratios are estimated by the AMS organic mass spectra using the Aiken ambient (AA) (57), and the ambient improved (AI) (58) methods. Uncertainty is reported between brackets. The AA method is known to underestimate O:C, whereas the AI method reproduces the O:C ratio of complex organic mixture within 10%. However, because most of the literature studies use the AA method, we report the O:C ratios calculated using both the AA and the AI parameterizations.