Table S1.

Relation between membrane resistance and LTD

Protocol	Genotype	Rm before Cj (b)	Rm after Cj (a)	n	a/b	P (t test)	P (ANOVA) before Cj	P (ANOVA) after Cj
1	WT	53.7 ± 4.4	54.7 ± 6.3	(6)	1.02	0.78
	K882A	48.2 ± 2.9	51.7 ± 3.0	(6)	1.07	0.10	0.62	0.93
	Δ7	51.2 ± 8.1	52.5 ± 7.2	(6)	1.02	0.60
2	WT	49.3 ± 1.7	50.0 ± 5.1	(6)	1.01	0.88
	K882A	50.1 ± 6.2	47.2 ± 8.2	(6)	0.94	0.47	0.93	0.63
	Δ7	52.0 ± 7.3	48.4 ± 7.7	(6)	0.93	0.14
3	WT	162.7 ± 40.2	146.0 ± 26.7	(5)	0.90	0.43
	K882A	164.3 ± 55.3	167.5 ± 64.6	(7)	1.02	0.81	0.94	0.81
	Δ7	182.5 ± 15.6	191.3 ± 13.7	(6)	1.05	0.35
4	WT	209.8 ± 13.1	199.8 ± 16.1	(3)	0.95	0.09
	K882A	223.0 ± 10.0	243.7 ± 22.7	(4)	1.09	0.26	0.11	0.10
	Δ7	185.9 ± 7.1	180.5 ± 4.5	(3)	0.97	0.53

No significant difference was detected between Rm values measured with four Cj protocol and three genotypes. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n). Note that changes in a/b ratio were less than 0.1.