Table 3.
Study | Sample | Avoided Inappropriate Exclusions? |
Patients and Settings Match Study Question? |
Blinded Interpretation of Index Test? |
Acceptable Index Test Application? |
Acceptable Reference (Gold) Standard? |
Outcomes Assessed by Blinded Assessor? |
Assessed Outcomes Pertinent? |
Appropriate Interval Between Index Test & Reference Standard? |
Same Reference (Gold) Standard for All Patients? |
All Patients Analyzed? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Backes 2012 |
Consecutive | YES | YES | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES |
Bo 2008 | Consecutive | YES | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES |
Boesiger 2005 |
Consecutive | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES |
Brunell 2013 | Consecutive | YES | YES | YES | NO | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES |
Carstairs 2006 |
Consecutive | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Czuczman 2013 |
Consecutive | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Dupont 2008 |
Consecutive | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | NO | YES |
Gangloff 2015 |
Consecutive | YES | YES | NO | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES | NO | NO |
Hann 2014 | Consecutive | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Landtblom 2002 |
Consecutive | YES | YES | NO | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Linn 1998 | Consecutive | YES | YES | NO | YES | NO | NO | YES | YES | NO | YES |
Morgenstern 1998 |
Consecutive | YES | YES | YES | NO | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES | NO |
O’Neill 2005 | Consecutive | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO |
Perry 2006 | Consecutive | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Perry 2010 | Consecutive | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | NO |
Perry 2011 | Consecutive | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO |
Perry 2013 | Consecutive | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Perry 2015 | Consecutive | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES |
van der Wee 1995 |
Consecutive | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES |
Wood 2005 | Consecutive | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES |
Kappa * | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.33 |
Prevalence adjusted, bias adjusted kappa as described by .