Table 3.
Logistic Multilevel Models for Each Type of Daily Support Participants Provide to Each Generation of Family Members
Emotional support | Advice | Practical help | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | p value | Odds ratio | B | SE | p value | Odds ratio | B | SE | p value | Odds ratio | |
Fixed effects | ||||||||||||
Intercept | −2.67 | 1.26 | .04 | −0.71 | 1.05 | .50 | −1.14 | 1.20 | .34 | |||
Generationa | −0.25 | 0.09 | <.01 | 0.78 | −0.60 | 0.09 | <.001 | 0.55 | −0.23 | 0.11 | .03 | 0.80 |
Control variables | ||||||||||||
Participant: Genderb | −0.10 | 0.19 | .61 | 0.91 | −0.19 | 0.16 | .24 | 0.83 | −0.27 | 0.18 | .14 | 0.77 |
Participant: Age | 0.00 | 0.02 | .93 | 1.00 | −0.02 | 0.02 | .18 | 0.98 | −0.02 | 0.02 | .31 | 0.98 |
Participant: Years of education | 0.11 | 0.05 | .02 | 1.12 | 0.10 | 0.04 | .02 | 1.11 | 0.10 | 0.05 | .03 | 1.11 |
Participant: Healthc | 0.13 | 0.10 | .23 | 1.13 | 0.06 | 0.09 | .50 | 1.06 | 0.08 | 0.10 | .40 | 1.09 |
Participant: Minority statusd | −0.07 | 0.22 | .74 | 0.93 | −0.05 | 0.18 | .80 | 0.96 | −0.04 | 0.20 | .86 | 0.97 |
Family member: Genderb | −0.51 | 0.09 | <.001 | 0.60 | −0.36 | 0.09 | <.001 | 0.70 | −0.56 | 0.11 | <.001 | 0.57 |
Family member: Distancee | −0.19 | 0.02 | <.001 | 0.83 | −0.20 | 0.02 | <.001 | 0.82 | −0.48 | 0.03 | <.001 | 0.62 |
Random effects | ||||||||||||
Intercept VAR (Level 2: Day) | 0.15 | 0.08 | .06 | 0.16 | 0.07 | .03 | 0.08 | 0.09 | .42 | |||
Intercept VAR (Level 3: Participant) | 1.21 | 0.18 | <.001 | 0.78 | 0.12 | <.001 | 0.90 | 0.15 | <.001 | |||
−2 (pseudo) log-likelihood | 21263.73 | 20846.91 | 23250.28 |
Note: Participant N = 191; Day N = 1,261 (up to 7 days per participant); Family member N = 707 (offspring n = 454; parent n = 253). VAR = variance.
a0 = offspring generation, 1 = parent generation.
b0 = female, 1 = male.
c1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = very good, 5 = excellent.
d0 = non-Hispanic white, 1 = racial/ethnic minority.
eDistance in miles using a log transformation.