Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep;6(3):338–346. doi: 10.1086/688058

Table 1.

Physician sample

UK FR DE IT ES US AR JP
No. of physicians 50 53 63 58 54 160 53 69
Specialty, %
 Cardiology 64 45 44 41 35 54 62 81
 Pulmonology 18 36 38 19 43 38 38 16
 Rheumatology 16 4 6 21 4 4 NA 1
 Internal medicinea 2 15 11 19 19 4 NA 1
  Cardiology 0 8 6 10 4 1 NA 1
  Pulmonology 0 6 3 7 9 2 NA 0
  Rheumatology 2 2 2 2 6 1 NA 0
Setting, %
 Hospital 98 91 79 95 98 24 85 100
 Office 2 9 21 5 2 76 15 NA
Affiliation, %
 Working in a specialized PH centerb 24c 38c 32c 12c 30c 51d 13c 30d
 Affiliated with a PH center 22 NA 17 19 28 23 NA NA
 Not affiliated with a PH center (non-PH center) 54 62 51 69 43 26 81 64
 Don’t know NA NA NA NA NA NA 6 6
Note

In cases where the physician type is not involved in the management of PH in their country, “not applicable” is used. AR: Argentina; DE: Germany; ES: Spain; FR: France; IT: Italy; JP: Japan; NA: not applicable; PH: pulmonary hypertension; UK: United Kingdom; US: United States.

a

Internal medicine physicians specializing in cardiology, pulmonology, or rheumatology.

b

Defined on the basis of European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society 2009 guidelines;1 in Argentina and Japan, an institution with a department specialized in treating PH.

c

Verified recognized specialized PH center.

d

Self-defined specialized PH center.