Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 12;11(9):e0162756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162756

Fig 2. Extracted hazard ratios for female gender regarding risk of appropriate shocks with 95% confidence intervals as reported in the respective publications.

Fig 2

‘PP’ indicates that the results were re-analyzed for primary prevention patients only. The pooled estimate is reported with a Knapp-Hartung adjusted 95% confidence interval. The dotted vertical line denotes a hazard ratio of 1, which corresponds to no difference in the risk between males and females.