Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 28;61(10):3072–3083. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-4027-8

Table 7.

Proportion of patients with a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥20 % compared with baseline, ≥30 % compared with baseline and eGFR values <60 mL/min/1.73 m2

Proportion of patients with Treatment group
Overall
N = 440
Treatment-naïve
n = 182
Treatment-experienced
n = 258
Prior ADV
n = 179
No Prior ADV
n = 261
eGFR decline ≥ 20 % versus baseline,
n (%)
65 (15) 22 (12) 43 (17) 31 (17) 34 (13)
P = 0.220 P = 0.221
eGFR decline ≥30 % versus baseline,
n (%)
26 (6) 8 (4) 18 (7) 10 (6) 16 (6)
P = 0.308 P = 1.00
eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2,
n (%)
48 (11) 3 (2) 45 (17) 35 (20) 13 (5)
P < 0.001 P < 0.001

ADV adefovir, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate

P values calculated using Fisher’s exact test (two-sided)