Skip to main content
. 2016 May 26;45(10):2049–2063. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0503-5

Table 3.

Polynomial regression analyses predicting early adolescent depressive symptoms

Predictor Concurrently (T1) Longitudinally (T2)a
b SE β b SE β
Adolescent report NI 4.942*** 1.129 .251 0.404 1.062 .020
Mother report NI 4.904*** 1.271 .229 3.772** 1.198 .175
(Adolescent report NI)2 −0.545 1.049 −.036 −0.253 0.957 −.017
(Mother report NI)2 −3.873** 1.265 −.218 −0.970 1.154 −.056
Adolescent × mother report NI 3.701* 1.752 .164 −1.298 1.588 −.058
Adolescent depressive symptoms T1 0.547*** 0.042 .534
Model R 2 (n) .14 (n = 487) .34 (n = 458)
Adolescent report NI 7.876*** 1.359 .395 2.478 1.280 .125
Father report NI −0.160 1.412 −.007 0.268 1.309 .012
(Adolescent report NI)2 0.323 1.485 .024 −1.480 1.350 −.112
(Father report NI)2 2.869 1.850 .141 −2.552 1.687 −.128
Adolescent × father report NI −5.631* 2.445 −.292 2.490 2.230 .131
Adolescent depressive symptoms T1 0.536*** 0.044 .526
Model R 2 (n) .13 (n = 441) .31 (n = 421)

NI negative interaction

p ≤ .05; ** p ≤ .01; *** p ≤ .001

aControlling for adolescent depressive symptoms at T1