Table 3.
Lobbying Expenditures for Cigarette and E‐cigarette Companies in New York City, Los Angeles, New York State, and California (2013 and 2014)a
| Cigarette Companies | E‐cigarette Companies | Totals | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip Morris | R.J. Reynolds | Lorillard | Logic | NJOY | Cigarette Companies | E‐cigarette Companies | All | |
| New York City | $712,803 | $270,815 | $36,000 | $66,000 | $500 | $1,019,618 | $66,500 | $1,086,118 |
| Los Angeles | $72,496 | $72,500 | $30,000 | $144,996 | $30,000 | $174,996 | ||
| New York State | $1,709,896 | $808,055 | $180,450 | $186,500 | $500 | $2,698,401 | $187,000 | $2,885,401 |
| California | $1,511,529 | $1,014,827 | $231,401 | $148,594 | $2,757,757 | $148,594 | $2,906,351 | |
| Total | $4,006,724 | $2,166,197 | $447,851 | $252,500 | $179,594 | $6,620,772 | $432,094 | $7,052,866 |
a
We present lobbying information for these 4 jurisdictions because their lobbying disclosure laws are transparent compared to those of Minnesota and Illinois. Lobbyists are required to report at the state level whether they lobby state officials, local officials, or both; only local officials were omitted.27,83