Table 3. QTL results for fruit orientation based on two classification methods.
QTL | Method | LG | LOD | Genetic interval (cM)a | Physical interval (Mb) | R2 (%) | Additive | Dominance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Left | Peak | Right | Size | Left | Peak | Right | Size | |||||||
Up12.1 | EP | 12 | 40.11 | 35.79 | 35.97 | 39.32 | 3.52 | 36.54 | 37.35 | 41.06 | 4.52 | 64.80 | −0.91 | −0.71 |
ELV | 12 | 28.19 | 52.00 | −0.67 | −0.30 |
a1-LOD drop confidence interval, the LOD peak markers of Up12.1 was scaffold1796.390960.