Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 21;39(4):908–917. doi: 10.1111/pce.12693

Table 2.

Comparison of T‐DNA copy number estimated using ddPCR or qPCR estimations of PCR template concentration of six different primersets targeting T‐DNA regions and either actin or α‐tubulin as a reference gene. Analysis was performed on digested DNA of VPZ‐46 T1.5 plant carrying a T‐DNA with three genes (AtVDE, AtPsbs and AtZEP). (± se; n = 4 for qPCR; n = 2 for ddPCR).

qPCR ddPCR
T‐DNA copy number T‐DNA copy number
Primer set name actin α‐tubulin actin α‐tubulin
AtPsbS_3 1.49 ± 0.11 2.85 ± 0.25 2.01 ± 0.05 1.82 ± 0.03
AtPsbS_4 1.86 ± 0.49 2.29 ± 0.06 2.19 ± 0.06 1.98 ± 0.03
AtVDE_1 2.08 ± 0.26 3.19 ± 0.13 2.26 ± 0.12 2.05 ± 0.06
AtVDE_4 3.51 ± 0.20 5.38 ± 0.10 2.06 ± 0.05 1.87 ± 0.02
AtZEP_1 2.01 ± 0.18 3.08 ± 0.09 2.16 ± 0.08 1.96 ± 0.04
AtZEP_4 1.92 ± 0.09 2.94 ± 0.05 2.16 ± 0.11 1.96 ± 0.06
Variance per method 1.10 0.02