Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2016 Aug 19;5:F1000 Faculty Rev-2036. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8438.1

Fine tuning of cytosolic Ca 2+ oscillations

Geneviève Dupont 1,a, Laurent Combettes 2
PMCID: PMC5021255  PMID: 27630768

Abstract

Ca 2+ oscillations, a widespread mode of cell signaling, were reported in non-excitable cells for the first time more than 25 years ago. Their fundamental mechanism, based on the periodic Ca 2+ exchange between the endoplasmic reticulum and the cytoplasm, has been well characterized. However, how the kinetics of cytosolic Ca 2+ changes are related to the extent of a physiological response remains poorly understood. Here, we review data suggesting that the downstream targets of Ca 2+ are controlled not only by the frequency of Ca 2+ oscillations but also by the detailed characteristics of the oscillations, such as their duration, shape, or baseline level. Involvement of non-endoplasmic reticulum Ca 2+ stores, mainly mitochondria and the extracellular medium, participates in this fine tuning of Ca 2+ oscillations. The main characteristics of the Ca 2+ exchange fluxes with these compartments are also reviewed.

Keywords: calcium oscillations, store-operated calcium entry, mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter, mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake 1

Introduction

Most of the time, the hormone-induced Ca 2+ increases that activate a variety of essential intracellular processes take the form of Ca 2+ oscillations. In non-excitable cells, these repetitive spikes mainly arise through the periodic exchange of Ca 2+ between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the cytosol, through the interplay between inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP 3)-sensitive Ca 2+ channels and SERCA pumps 1, 2. This basic mechanism, summarized in Figure 1, has now been well characterized and accounts for the observed increase in the frequency of Ca 2+ oscillations with increasing concentrations of InsP 3 accompanying the rise in stimulation. Such a process is referred to as frequency encoding. It was often hypothesized that oscillations provide a digital signal to downstream effectors that are in turn stimulated in an ON or OFF manner. Indeed, if a process is activated above a threshold Ca 2+ concentration, oscillations allow Ca 2+ to reach this threshold repetitively even if the average Ca 2+ signal remains below the threshold 3, 4.

Figure 1. Basic mechanism of cytosolic Ca 2+ oscillations in non-excitable cells.

Figure 1.

These oscillations are initiated by the stimulus-induced rise in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP 3) concentration and occur through a repetitive exchange of Ca 2+ between the cytoplasm and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER).

Based on the observed frequency encoding of the extracellular signal, it was also postulated that the physiological response in the form of secretion, gene expression, proliferation, etc., would in turn be sensitive to the frequency of Ca 2+ oscillations 5– 8. Although intuitively attractive, such frequency sensitivity of the downstream targets of Ca 2+ has not been well corroborated by data. Besides the beautiful example of Ca 2+-dependent calmodulin kinase II regulation by high-frequency Ca 2+ spikes 9 or of selective gene expression in T-lymphocytes 4, there are few clear examples of physiological responses to Ca 2+ increases that are quantitatively controlled by the frequency of the Ca 2+ spikes. This statement does not mean that frequency encoding does not occur or that the frequency of Ca 2+ oscillations does not affect the extent of the Ca 2+-mediated physiological response. Indeed, a higher frequency of oscillations implies a larger average Ca 2+ level, which may be per se the reason for the larger response. However, modulating the amplitude of the oscillations, their baseline level, or the duration of the spikes also modifies the average level and hence the response. As another example, spikes preceded by an important pacemaker-like Ca 2+ increase could activate slower downstream targets characterized by a low threshold of activation. In such cases, frequency cannot be considered as the key characteristic of the oscillatory pattern and the response is not simply frequency sensitive. However, in the numerous studies about Ca 2+ oscillations, frequency is the most studied parameter and the most commonly related to the extent of Ca 2+-mediated physiological responses.

In fact, the relative scarcity of phenomena that are purely controlled by the frequency of Ca 2+ oscillations is not so surprising given that the period of Ca 2+ oscillations can be subject to a significant level of randomness ( Figure 2 and 8, 10). In some instances, it has even been explicitly observed that the frequency does not by itself regulate the extent of the second-messenger-mediated response. This is the case, for example, for carbachol-induced salivary secretion by acinar cells 11. At mammalian fertilization, the total integrated Ca 2+ signal input is the most relevant parameter ensuring completion of fertilization-associated events 12. Interestingly, frequency encoding is also not a universal feature of Ca 2+ oscillations, as it was shown in some cases, such as in acetylcholine-stimulated pancreatic acinar cells 13, methacholine-stimulated lacrimal cells 14, fish hepatocytes 15, or in cell lines expressing the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 16, that an increase in stimulation does not affect the frequency of the resulting Ca 2+ oscillations. In these cases, of course, it cannot be expected that the frequency of Ca 2+ oscillations would be the way by which cells encode the information related to the level of response that is precisely triggered by the stimulation.

Figure 2. Various characteristics of Ca 2+ oscillations that participate in fine tuning.

Figure 2.

Traces show typical curves of Fluo4 loaded HeLa cells challenged with either 2 µM histamine (upper trace) or 3 µM (lower trace). Calcium imaging was performed as described previously 10. Fluorescence images were collected every 3 seconds by an EM-CCD camera (Hamamatsu), digitized, and integrated in real time by an image processor (Metafluor). Letters indicate characteristics of Ca 2+ oscillations that, besides their frequency, can affect the cellular response to these repetitive Ca 2+ increases (a: latency of the Ca 2+ response to the stimulation, b: minimal Ca 2+ level between the spikes or baseline Ca 2+, c: duration, or half-width, of the spikes, and d: rate of decrease of the response or degree of sustainability).

Also, recent investigations tend to suggest that rather than the frequency alone, the detailed dynamic characteristics of the Ca 2+ increase pattern play an important role in determining the extent of the cell response. As illustrated in Figure 2, in addition to frequency, Ca 2+ oscillations can vary in the amplitude and the width of the spikes, the baseline Ca 2+ level, and the degree of sustainability. We refer to modifications of one of these characteristics as fine tuning of Ca 2+ oscillations to emphasize that they imply fine regulation of cytosolic Ca 2+ that goes behind the mechanism schematized in Figure 1 accounting for the existence and the frequency of oscillations. Various observations corroborate that these properties are important determinants for the physiological response of the cell. For example, the CD147 factor promotes oncogenic activities and influences the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by enhancing both the amplitude and the frequency of ER-dependent Ca 2+ oscillations 17. In intestinal stem cells, dietary and stress stimuli are integrated in such a way that frequent and robust Ca 2+ oscillations are associated with a poised proliferative state, while smoother oscillations on a more elevated level accompany active proliferation 18. Fine tuning of Ca 2+ signals also plays a role in the differentiation of neuronal and muscle cells (see 19 for review). In astrocytes, knocking-down the Na +–Ca 2+ exchanger (NCLX) that mediates Ca 2+ release from mitochondria slightly affects cytosolic Ca 2+ changes and, by doing so, significantly reduces Ca 2+-dependent processes, such as glutamate release, wound closure, and proliferation 20. Cell survival, death, and adaptation are sensitive to changes in Ca 2+ patterns due to the interplay between ER/cytoplasmic Ca 2+ exchanges and mitochondria and lysosomes 21. Shigella bacteria also fine tune the Ca 2+ responses when they invade epithelial cells. While the wild-type strain induces rather smooth and low-amplitude Ca 2+ variations in the cytoplasm of the host cell, a less-invasive mutant strain induces more robust Ca 2+ responses which, paradoxically, are associated with a higher survival of the host cells during the first hours following invasion 22.

On another level, the precise isoforms of InsP 3 receptors expressed by a given cell – which have been shown to substantially affect the shape of the Ca 2+ oscillations 23– 25 – are critical for cell death and survival decisions 26. Finally, bioinformatics analyses highlighted that in cancer cells and tissues, the main processes associated with Ca 2+ dynamics that are perturbed are the mechanisms of store-operated calcium entry (SOCE) and of calcium reuptake into mitochondria 27. Both of these processes are related to the fine tuning of Ca 2+ oscillations, as discussed below. Altogether, these observations call for a more detailed understanding of oscillation-associated Ca 2+ dynamics. Understanding why Ca 2+ oscillates and what regulates the frequency of oscillations is not sufficient to understand their physiological impact, but the duration and shape of the peaks, their sustainability, and the baseline Ca 2+ level must be carefully taken into account. In the following sections, we elaborate on two key controllers of the InsP 3R-based Ca 2+ oscillations, both related to Ca 2+ stores other than the ER, namely the mitochondria and the extracellular medium. We briefly review and discuss some of the main recent observations about their interplay with the InsP 3-induced Ca 2+ spikes.

Mitochondrial Ca 2+ uptake and release

By stimulating the activity of key enzymes involved in mitochondrial ATP synthesis, Ca 2+ entry into mitochondria stimulates metabolism, thereby coupling ATP synthesis with energy demand 28. That Ca 2+ exchange between the cytosol and the mitochondria in turn affects InsP 3-induced cytosolic Ca 2+ signals was put forward quite early 29, 30, but this concept was somewhat put aside for a decade. The molecular identification of the mitochondrial Ca 2+ uniporter (MCU), a voltage, cytosolic, and mitochondrial Ca 2+-sensitive transporter 31– 34, awakened interest in this question. Ca 2+ entry into mitochondria through the MCU is a highly non-linear function of cytosolic Ca 2+ 33. The MCU is in fact the Ca 2+ pore-forming component of the uniporter and is part of a large complex of proteins that are required for Ca 2+ channel activity or to regulate it under various conditions. For example, MICU1 (mitochondrial Ca 2+ uptake 1) limits mitochondrial Ca 2+ influx at low cytosolic Ca 2+ concentration and the interaction between the MCU and MICU1 requires the expression of another component, called EMRE for essential MCU regulator 34, 35. Ca 2+ efflux back into the cytoplasm occurs through a NCLX. As expected, modifying any of these pathways affects the frequency of the oscillations; interestingly, increasing the activity of the MCU can both increase and decrease the frequency of oscillations 36. In addition to its effect on the frequency of the oscillations, the MCU controls the width of the spikes and the sustainability of the oscillations, as knocking-down the MCU broadens Ca 2+ oscillations and accelerates the rundown of the oscillations in rat basophilic leukemia (RBL)-1 cells ( Figure 3). Such rundown suppresses gene expression in response to leukotriene receptor activation 37. Mitochondria also affect the rate of rise and fall of cytosolic Ca 2+ and thus the half-width and duration of the spike. More specifically, mitochondria smooth out cytosolic Ca 2+ changes mainly because they have a ~30 times larger Ca 2+ buffering capacity than the cytoplasm 38. Also, because of their slow dynamics, mitochondria continue releasing Ca 2+ between subsequent releases of Ca 2+ from the ER, thus playing a key role in determining the baseline cytosolic Ca 2+ level. Thus, mitochondrial Ca 2+ handling through the MCU and the NCLX clearly fine tunes cytosolic Ca 2+ oscillations.

Figure 3. The mitochondrial Ca 2+ uniporter (MCU) participates in the fine tuning of Ca 2+ oscillations.

Figure 3.

A. Control recording of Ca 2+ responses in rat basophilic leukemia (RBL)-1 cells stimulated by LTC4 in 2 mM external Ca 2+. B. Same recording after MCU knockdown. Ca 2+ entry in mitochondria via the MCU broadens cytosolic Ca 2+ spikes and decreases their sustainability. From Samanta et al. 37. Shown are the ratios of fluorescence of Fura-2 loaded cells excited at 356 and 380 nm.

The kinetics of the MCU and the NCLX have been fairly well characterized, but much remains to be done to fully identify other fluxes. The permeability transition pore (PTP) in its low conduction mode participates in the Ca 2+ exchange process in HeLa cells, as its inhibition by cyclosporine A affects Ca 2+ oscillations 36, 39. The functional role of LETM1-mediated Ca 2+ transport also remains poorly understood. This EF-containing transmembrane protein has been functionally identified as a Ca 2+/H + exchanger of the inner mitochondrial membrane 40, 41, although this remains controversial 42. In electrically excitable cells such as cardiomyocytes and neurons, ryanodine receptors have been shown to transport Ca 2+ into mitochondria 43, 44. A rapid Ca 2+ uptake mode (RaM) of poorly identified molecular nature has been reported in studies on isolated mitochondria from cardiac and liver cells 45, 46. However, the implication of RyR and RaM in mitochondrial Ca 2+ influx remains to be firmly established 47, 48. Finally, in a more indirect manner, mitochondrial metabolism also affects cytosolic Ca 2+ signals, mainly by modifying the mitochondrial voltage across the internal mitochondrial membrane, which greatly affects the activities of all of the above-mentioned fluxes 29. All of the above-cited phenomena are thus potentially implicated in the control of the detailed characteristics of Ca 2+ oscillations. Their interplay with the activities of the MCU and the NCLX is regulated by an intricate and complex network of interactions implicating cytosolic and mitochondrial Ca 2+ as well as mitochondrial voltage and numerous accessory proteins.

Store-operated Ca 2+ entry

Cytosolic Ca 2+ oscillations are sustained by SOCE from the extracellular medium 49. This mechanism involves the stromal interaction molecule (STIM) and the Orai protein 50. The transmembrane ER protein STIM is sensitive to Ca 2+ changes in the ER through an EF-hand facing the lumen of the store. Decrease in luminal Ca 2+ below ~200 μM (for the STIM1 isoform) leads to STIM aggregation, followed by migration to ER–plasma membrane junctions. Here, STIM oligomers can bind and activate Orai, a four-transmembrane-domain plasma-membrane-spanning protein, thus forming a channel (known as CRAC for Ca 2+-release-activated Ca 2+ channel) allowing Ca 2+ to enter down the chemical gradient. Another STIM isoform, STIM2, has a lower affinity for ER Ca 2+, which allows for activation of Ca 2+ entry at moderate ER depletion, although at a reduced rate 51. Mammalian cells have genes for the three homologs Orai1, Orai2, and Orai3, and it is thought that Orai2 and/or Orai3 act as compensative types for the lack of Orai1. Orai channels are made of multiple subunits, and CRAC channel gating by STIM is best described by a Monod-Wyman-Changeux scheme in which tetramers of Orai have four STIM binding sites 50, 52.

Although the mechanism just described has most of the time been investigated in conditions when the Ca 2+ pools are emptied artificially, studies performed in a variety of cell types demonstrate that STIM expression is essential for an ensemble of physiological processes 53. To quote here just one recent example, in airway smooth muscle, altered expression and function of STIM/Orai proteins have been linked to pathologies including restenosis, hypertension, and atopic asthma 54.

The STIM-Orai pathway for Ca 2+ entry displays a hysteretic behavior: STIM-Orai association and dissociation do not occur at similar ER Ca 2+ concentrations 55. Although the origin and the physiological significance of this unusual behavior remains unknown, it might be related to the inactivation of SOCE-mediated Ca 2+ entry by cytosolic Ca 2+ itself, a process that has long been thought to be mediated by calmodulin 56 but was recently suggested to be due to a calmodulin-independent conformational change within the pore allowed by two specific Orai residues, Y80 and W76 57, 58. This Ca 2+-induced inactivation (CDI) of SOCE allows for a modulation of Ca 2+ entry depending on the level of cytosolic Ca 2+, thus shaping the oscillations.

The key effect of STIM and Orai on the oscillatory Ca 2+ pattern and its downstream targets are also much documented. Through the specific ER Ca 2+ sensor STIM2 that has a high K M for Ca 2+, SOCE determines the basal level of Ca 2+ in HeLa cells 51. More generally, SOCE-mediated Ca 2+ entry has a significant effect on Ca 2+ oscillations, as it can in turn affect all Ca 2+ exchanges between the cytoplasm and the internal stores. A less straightforward but highly interesting effect was uncovered in RBL-2H3 cells. Because the activity of the plasma membrane phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5 kinase that replenishes the PIP 2 pool is Ca 2+ sensitive, SOCE is necessary to avoid the rundown of the oscillations. Indeed, in the absence of SOCE, cysteinyl leukotriene type I receptor activation leads to the exhaustion of the PIP 2 pool and hence to the disappearance of InsP 3-induced Ca 2+ release from internal stores 59.

In RBL cells displaying Ca 2+ oscillating, gene expression is entirely driven by SOCE and proceeds as an all-or-nothing process in individual cells 60. During maturation of mouse oocytes, STIM1 and Orai1 control the basal Ca 2+ level and the whole Ca 2+ homeostasis, thus controlling meiosis resumption 61. At fertilization of pig eggs, overexpression of STIM1 and Orai1 substantially decreases the number of Ca 2+ spikes induced by sperm binding ( Figure 4). Moreover, these spikes are broader and their frequency is reduced as compared to control eggs 62. This observation contrasts with the observed decreased frequency of fertilization-induced Ca 2+ oscillations in hamster eggs when decreasing external Ca 2+ concentration 63. It shows that the control of Ca 2+ signaling by SOCE cannot be directly assimilated to the control of Ca 2+ signals by the extracellular Ca 2+ concentration. Interestingly, if SOCE is inhibited, fertilization is also impaired, as oscillations last for about 1 hour instead of at least 2 hours. In mice, cytoplasmic Ca 2+ levels are elevated for ~50% of the time in STIM1+Orai1-overexpressing oocytes in the first 2 hours after fertilization, as compared to only less than 20% of the time in control oocytes. Despite this larger Ca 2+ signal, most of the STIM1/Orai1-overexpressing oocytes do not reach the two-cell stage 64. However, female mice lacking Orai1 are fertile 65, while male mice are sterile due to severe defects in spermatogenesis 66.

Figure 4. Effect of store-operated calcium entry (SOCE) activity on fertilization-induced Ca 2+ oscillations in pig eggs.

Figure 4.

A. Co-overexpression of Orai1 and stromal interaction molecule 1 (Stim1) leads to broader spikes with reduced frequency and that stop prematurely. B. Control situation. Reproduced with permission from Chunmin Wang, Lu Zhang, Laurie A. Jaeger, and Zoltan Machaty. Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry Sustains the Fertilization Ca 2+ Signal in Pig Eggs. Biol Reprod 2015; 93(1):25. DOI:10.1095/ biolreprod.114.126151 62.

Conclusion

It is by now clear that in many cases the existence of Ca 2+ oscillations does not provide an ON/OFF signal for the Ca 2+-mediated response to the stimulus nor is the extent of the response only determined by the frequency of the oscillations. How the exact shape of this Ca 2+ signal is controlled, i.e. what we refer to here as its fine tuning, can alter the response qualitatively and quantitatively. Ca 2+ exchanges with mitochondria and SOCE play an important role in fine tuning cytosolic Ca 2+ oscillations. Interestingly, there is some dynamic interplay between these two Ca 2+ sources as, in mesothelial cells in the absence of external Ca 2+, mitochondrial Ca 2+ takes over to provide a Ca 2+ influx pathway during oscillations 67. Moreover, other organelles such as the Golgi 68, 69 or the acidic organelles 21, 70, 71 are also involved. Genetic regulations further complicate the intricate network of Ca 2+ fluxes: in lymphocytes, Ca 2+-dependent activation of CREB controls the level of expression of the MCU, which explains why the expression of this uniporter is modified in the absence of InsP 3 receptors or of the STIM/Orai machinery 72. Much remains to be done to understand how diverse factors interact to control the detailed pattern of Ca 2+ oscillations and how this pattern can in some cases significantly affect the physiological response. Integration of the Ca 2+ signal over long periods of time may explain why small changes in the pattern of the Ca 2+ spikes become significant in some cases. By such integration, the extent of activation of the downstream targets of Ca 2+ is modified by apparently minor changes in the Ca 2+ oscillatory pattern, which are less visible than its frequency. Spatial aspects most certainly also play an important role in this respect, as the Ca 2+-sensitive targets are far from being homogeneously distributed within the cell 73. Finally, the kinetics and thresholds for Ca 2+ activation of these targets are expected to be at least as important, as in other signaling cascades playing a key role in the storage of information 74.

Editorial Note on the Review Process

F1000 Faculty Reviews are commissioned from members of the prestigious F1000 Faculty and are edited as a service to readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, the referees provide input before publication and only the final, revised version is published. The referees who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations but without their reports on earlier versions (any comments will already have been addressed in the published version).

The referees who approved this article are:

  • Martin Bootman, Department of Life, Health and Chemical Sciences, Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK

  • Jan Parys, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Signaling, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg O/N-1 B802, Leuven, Belgium

  • James Putney, Laboratory of Signal Transduction, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

Funding Statement

Geneviève Dupont is Research Director at the Belgian FRS-FNRS. This work was supported by the FNRS CDR n° J.0007.1.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; referees: 3 approved]

References

  • 1. Berridge MJ, Bootman MD, Lipp P: Calcium--a life and death signal. Nature. 1998;395(6703):645–648. 10.1038/27094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Berridge MJ: Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793(6):933–940. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gu X, Spitzer NC: Distinct aspects of neuronal differentiation encoded by frequency of spontaneous Ca 2+ transients. Nature. 1995;375(6534):784–787. 10.1038/375784a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Dolmetsch RE, Xu K, Lewis RS: Calcium oscillations increase the efficiency and specificity of gene expression. Nature. 1998;392(6679):933–936. 10.1038/31960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Berridge MJ, Rapp PE: A comparative survey of the function, mechanism and control of cellular oscillators. J Exp Biol. 1979;81:217–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Rapp PE, Berridge MJ: The control of transepithelial potential oscillations in the salivary gland of Calliphora erythrocephala. J Exp Biol. 1981;93:119–132. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Goldbeter A, Dupont G, Berridge MJ: Minimal model for signal-induced Ca2+ oscillations and for their frequency encoding through protein phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87(4):1461–1465. 10.1073/pnas.87.4.1461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Thurley K, Tovey SC, Moenke G, et al. : Reliable encoding of stimulus intensities within random sequences of intracellular Ca 2+ spikes. Sci Signal. 2014;7(331):ra59. 10.1126/scisignal.2005237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. De Koninck P, Schulman H: Sensitivity of CaM kinase II to the frequency of Ca 2+ oscillations. Science. 1998;279(5348):227–230. 10.1126/science.279.5348.227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Dupont G, Abou-Lovergne A, Combettes L: Stochastic aspects of oscillatory Ca 2+ dynamics in hepatocytes. Biophys J. 2008;95(5):2193–2202. 10.1529/biophysj.108.133777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sneyd J, Crampin E, Yule D: Multiscale modelling of saliva secretion. Math Biosci. 2014;257:69–79. 10.1016/j.mbs.2014.06.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ozil JP, Markoulaki S, Toth S, et al. : Egg activation events are regulated by the duration of a sustained [Ca 2+] cyt signal in the mouse. Dev Biol. 2005;282(1):39–54. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.02.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Yule DI, Gallacher DV: Oscillations of cytosolic calcium in single pancreatic acinar cells stimulated by acetylcholine. FEBS Lett. 1988;239(2):358–362. 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80951-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Putney JW, Bird GS: Calcium signaling in lacrimal glands. Cell Calcium. 2014;55(6):290–296. 10.1016/j.ceca.2014.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Schweizer N, Kummer U, Hercht H, et al. : Amplitude-encoded calcium oscillations in fish cells. Biophys Chem. 2011;159(2–3):294–302. 10.1016/j.bpc.2011.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Nash MS, Schell MJ, Atkinson PJ, et al. : Determinants of metabotropic glutamate receptor-5-mediated Ca 2+ and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate oscillation frequency. Receptor density versus agonist concentration. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(39):35947–35960. 10.1074/jbc.M205622200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Tang J, Guo YS, Yu XL, et al. : CD147 reinforces [Ca 2+] i oscillations and promotes oncogenic progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015;6(33):34831–34845. 10.18632/oncotarget.5225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Deng H, Gerencser AA, Jasper H: Signal integration by Ca 2+ regulates intestinal stem-cell activity. Nature. 2015;528(7581):212–217. 10.1038/nature16170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Pinto MC, Tonelli FM, Vieira AL, et al. : Studying complex system: calcium oscillations as attractor of cell differentiation. Integr Biol (Camb). 2016;8(2):130–148. 10.1039/c5ib00285k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Parnis J, Montana V, Delgado-Martinez I, et al. : Mitochondrial exchanger NCLX plays a major role in the intracellular Ca 2+ signaling, gliotransmission, and proliferation of astrocytes. J Neurosci. 2013;33(17):7206–7219. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5721-12.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. La Rovere RM, Roest G, Bultynck G, et al. : Intracellular Ca 2+ signaling and Ca 2+ microdomains in the control of cell survival, apoptosis and autophagy. Cell Calcium. 2016; pii: S0143-4160(16)30048-3. 10.1016/j.ceca.2016.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bonnet M, Tran Van Nhieu G: How Shigella Utilizes Ca 2+ Jagged Edge Signals during Invasion of Epithelial Cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016;6:16. 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Miyakawa T, Maeda A, Yamazawa T, et al. : Encoding of Ca 2+ signals by differential expression of IP 3 receptor subtypes. EMBO J. 1999;18(5):1303–1308. 10.1093/emboj/18.5.1303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Dupont G, Combettes L: Modelling the effect of specific inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor isoforms on cellular Ca 2+ signals. Biol Cell. 2006;98(3):171–182. 10.1042/BC20050032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Parys JB, De Smedt H: Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and its receptors. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;740:255–279. 10.1007/978-94-007-2888-2_11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ivanova H, Vervliet T, Missiaen L, et al. : Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor-isoform diversity in cell death and survival. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843(10):2164–2183. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Robil N, Petel F, Kilhoffer MC, et al. : Glioblastoma and calcium signaling--analysis of calcium toolbox expression. Int J Dev Biol. 2015;59(7–5):407–415. 10.1387/ijdb.150200jh [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Gaspers LD, Mémin E, Thomas AP: Calcium-dependent physiologic and pathologic stimulus-metabolic response coupling in hepatocytes. Cell Calcium. 2012;52(1):93–102. 10.1016/j.ceca.2012.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jouaville LS, Ichas F, Mazat JP: Modulation of cell calcium signals by mitochondria. Mol Cell Biochem. 1998;184(1–2):371–376. 10.1023/A:1006850121769 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zimmerman B: Control of Ins P 3-induced Ca 2+ oscillations in permeabilized blowfly salivary gland cells: contribution of mitochondria. J Physiol. 2000;525(Pt 3):707–719. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00707.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. De Stefani D, Raffaello A, Teardo E, et al. : A forty-kilodalton protein of the inner membrane is the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nature. 2011;476(7360):336–340. 10.1038/nature10230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Baughman JM, Perocchi F, Girgis HS, et al. : Integrative genomics identifies MCU as an essential component of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nature. 2011;476(7360):341–345. 10.1038/nature10234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Csordás G, Golenár T, Seifert EL, et al. : MICU1 controls both the threshold and cooperative activation of the mitochondrial Ca 2+ uniporter. Cell Metab. 2013;17(6):976–987. 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Vais H, Mallilankaraman K, Mak DO, et al. : EMRE Is a Matrix Ca 2+ Sensor that Governs Gatekeeping of the Mitochondrial Ca 2+ Uniporter. Cell Rep. 2016;14(3):403–10. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Foskett JK, Philipson B: The mitochondrial Ca 2+ uniporter complex. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;78:3–8. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.11.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Wacquier B, Combettes L, Van Nhieu GT, et al. : Interplay Between Intracellular Ca 2+ Oscillations and Ca 2+-stimulated Mitochondrial Metabolism. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 19316. 10.1038/srep19316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Samanta K, Douglas S, Parekh AB: Mitochondrial calcium uniporter MCU supports cytoplasmic Ca 2+ oscillations, store-operated Ca 2+ entry and Ca 2+-dependent gene expression in response to receptor stimulation. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101188. 10.1371/journal.pone.0101188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Fall CP, Keizer JE: Mitochondrial modulation of intracellular Ca 2+ signaling. J Theor Biol. 2001;210(2):151–165. 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Bondarenko AI, Jean-Quartier C, Malli R, et al. : Characterization of distinct single-channel properties of Ca 2+ inward currents in mitochondria. Pflugers Arch. 2013;465(7):997–1010. 10.1007/s00424-013-1224-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Jiang D, Zhao L, Clapham DE: Genome-wide RNAi screen identifies Letm1 as a mitochondrial Ca 2+/H + antiporter. Science. 2009;326(5949):144–147. 10.1126/science.1175145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Tsai MF, Jiang D, Zhao L, et al. : Functional reconstitution of the mitochondrial Ca 2+/H + antiporter Letm1. J Gen Physiol. 2014;143(1):67–73. 10.1085/jgp.201311096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Nowikovsky K, Bernardi P: LETM1 in mitochondrial cation transport. Front Physiol. 2014;5:83. 10.3389/fphys.2014.00083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Jakob R, Beutner G, Sharma VK, et al. : Molecular and functional identification of a mitochondrial ryanodine receptor in neurons. Neurosci Lett. 2014;575:7–12. 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.05.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Beutner G, Sharma VK, Gioannucci DR, et al. : Identification of a ryanodine receptor in rat heart mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(24):21482–21488. 10.1074/jbc.M101486200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Santo-Domingo J, Demaurex C: Calcium uptake mechanisms of mitochondria. Biochem Biophys Acta. 2010;1797(6–7):907–912. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Buntinas L, Gunter KK, Sparagna GC, et al. : The rapid mode of calcium uptake into heart mitochondria (RaM): comparison to RaM in liver mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1504(2–3):248–261. 10.1016/S0005-2728(00)00254-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Ryu SY, Beutner G, Dirksen R, et al. : Mitochondrial ryanodine receptors and other mitochondrial Ca 2+ permeable channels. FEBS Lett. 2010;584(10):1948–1955. 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.01.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Dedkova EN, Blatter LA: Calcium signaling in cardiac mitochondria. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;58:125–133. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.12.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Putney JW, Jr: A model for receptor-regulated calcium entry. Cell Calcium. 1986;7(1):1–12. 10.1016/0143-4160(86)90026-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Tojyo Y, Morita T, Nezu A, et al. : Key components of store-operated Ca 2+ entry in non-excitable cells. J Pharmacol Sci. 2014;125(4):340–346. 10.1254/jphs.14R06CP [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Brandman O, Liou J, Park WS, et al. : STIM2 is a feedback regulator that stabilizes basal cytosolic and endoplasmic reticulum Ca 2+ levels. Cell. 2007;131(7):1327–1339. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Hoover PJ, Lewis RS: Stoichiometric requirements for trapping and gating of Ca 2+ release-activated Ca 2+ (CRAC) channels by stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(32):13299–13304. 10.1073/pnas.1101664108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Dupont G, Combettes L, Bird GS, et al. : Calcium oscillations. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(3): pii a004226. 10.1101/cshperspect.a004226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Spinelli AM, Trebak M: Orai channel-mediated Ca 2+ signals in vascular and airway smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2016;310(6):C402–13. 10.1152/ajpcell.00355.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Suzuki J, Kanemaru K, Ishii K, et al. : Imaging intraorganellar Ca 2+ at subcellular resolution using CEPIA. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4153. 10.1038/ncomms5153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Mullins FM, Lewis RS: The inactivation domain of STIM1 is functionally coupled with the Orai1 pore to enable Ca 2+-dependent inactivation. J Gen Physiol. 2016;147(2):153–164. 10.1085/jgp.201511438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Mullins FM, Park CY, Dolmetsch RE, et al. : STIM1 and calmodulin interact with Orai1 to induce Ca 2+-dependent inactivation of CRAC channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(36):15495–15500. 10.1073/pnas.0906781106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Mullins FM, Yen M, Lewis RS: Orai1 pore residues control CRAC channel inactivation independently of calmodulin. J Gen Physiol. 2016;147(2):137–152. 10.1085/jgp.201511437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Alswied A, Parekh AB: Ca 2+ Influx through Store-operated Calcium Channels Replenishes the Functional Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate Pool Used by Cysteinyl Leukotriene Type I Receptors. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(49):29555–295566. 10.1074/jbc.M115.678292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Kar P, Nelson C, Parekh AB: CRAC channels drive digital activation and provide analog control and synergy to Ca 2+-dependent gene regulation. Curr Biol. 2012;22(3):242–247. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Cheon B, Lee HC, Wakai T, et al. : Ca 2+ influx and the store-operated Ca 2+ entry pathway undergo regulation during mouse oocyte maturation. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24(9):1396–1410. 10.1091/mbc.E13-01-0065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Wang C, Zhang L, Jaeger LA, et al. : Store-operated Ca 2+ entry sustains the fertilization Ca 2+ signal in pig eggs. Biol Reprod. 2015;93(1):25. 10.1095/biolreprod.114.126151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Igusa Y, Miyazaki S: Effects of altered extracellular and intracellular calcium concentration on hyperpolarizing responses of the hamster egg. J Physiol. 1983;340:611–632. 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Lee B, Palermo G, Machaca K: Downregulation of store-operated Ca 2+ entry during mammalian meiosis is required for the egg-to-embryo transition. J Cell Sci. 2013;126 (Pt 7):1672–1681. 10.1242/jcs.121335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Davis FM, Janoshazi A, Janardhan KS, et al. : Essential role of Orai1 store-operated calcium channels in lactation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(18):5827–5832. 10.1073/pnas.1502264112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Davis FM, Goulding EH, D’Agostin DM, et al. : Male infertility in mice lacking the store-operated Ca 2+ channel Orai1. Cell Calcium. 2016;59(4):189–197. 10.1016/j.ceca.2016.02.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Pecze L, Blum W, Schwaller B: Routes of Ca 2+ shuttling during Ca 2+ oscillations: FOCUS ON THE ROLE OF MITOCHONDRIAL Ca 2+ HANDLING AND CYTOSOLIC Ca 2+ BUFFERS. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(47):28214–28230. 10.1074/jbc.M115.663179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Van Baelen K, Vanoevelent J, Callewaert G, et al. : The contribution of the SPCA1 Ca 2+ pump to the Ca 2+ accumulation in the Golgi apparatus of HeLa cells assessed via RNA-mediated interference. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;306(2):430–436. 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00977-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Pizzo P, Lissandron V, Capitanio P, et al. : Ca 2+ signalling in the Golgi apparatus. Cell Calcium. 2011;50(2):184–192. 10.1016/j.ceca.2011.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Patel S, Cai X: Evolution of acidic Ca 2+ stores and their resident Ca 2+-permeable channels. Cell Calcium. 2015;57(3):222–230. 10.1016/j.ceca.2014.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Penny CJ, Kilpatrick BS, Han JM, et al. : A computational model of lysosome-ER Ca 2+ microdomains. J Cell Sci. 2014;217(Pt 13):2934–2943. 10.1242/jcs.149047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Shanmughapriya S, Rajan S, Hoffman NE, et al. : Ca 2+ signals regulate mitochondrial metabolism by stimulating CREB-mediated expression of the mitochondrial Ca 2+ uniporter gene MCU. Sci Signal. 2015;8(366):ra23. 10.1126/scisignal.2005673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Mehta S, Aye-Han NN, Ganesan A, et al. : Calmodulin-controlled spatial decoding of oscillatory Ca 2+ signals by calcineurin. eLife. 2014;3:e03765. 10.7554/eLife.03765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Bhalla US, Iyengar R: Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. Science. 1999;283(5400):381–386. 10.1126/science.283.5400.381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

RESOURCES