Interactive. Case presentations we worked through |
Students competing to get thoughts in can be distracting. |
It was presented like how we would see patients in the ED and it emphasized the not-so-clear decision patients that can be encountered |
Online videos were useful review but did not go in-depth for new learning |
Interactive; good thinking process for tough clinical situations |
The discussion is a bit of a free-for-all. For those who do not like talking over others, this is a challenging format |
I felt that it was much easier to learn actively instead of passively |
Seems like we hit the major learning points, but not sure - variable experience depending on group |
High quality chalk-talk style lectures, and then the in-class interactive portion allows us to apply & solidify what I just learned |
It’s harder for everyone to be able to participate equally especially if you are a quiet person |
Puts in mindset of clinical approach. Helps clarify factors going into decision-making |
Sometimes I know the answers and you have to deal with others putting out weird recommendations |
The case application and discussion following the online learning/review |
I wish the videos were a little more advanced, much of the information I already felt familiar with |
Learning from others is more effective and engaging than lecture; there is more freedom/comfort to ask questions |
A little slower than traditional content |
Spending my own time learning the basics and having time to apply the concepts and info |
Hard to follow everything we’d done in each case at times. Pre-classroom work needed to be more advanced |
Closer to real decision-making, time to discuss/debate/clarify knowledge and misconceptions |
Sometimes a little rushed with more advanced topics, but felt comfortable checking in/asking questions |