Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 9;233(19):3603–3613. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4397-4

Table 2.

Hourly food intake and meal pattern microstructure parameters in the feeding behaviour test (Experiment 2)

CBG (mg/kg)
0 30 60 120 240
Hourly food intake (g)
Hour 1 0.47 (±0.22) 0.40 (±0.25) 0.55 (±0.25) 1.06 (±0.30) 0.89 (±0.25)
Hour 2 0.38 (±0.18) 0.49 (±0.20) 0.46 (±0.17) 0.59 (±0.15) 0.99** (±0.19)
Total 0.85 (±0.28) 0.89 (±0.40) 1.01 (±0.29) 1.66* (±0.37) 1.89** (±0.38)
Meal size (g)
Meal 1 0.65 (±0.23) 0.38 (±0.16) 0.57 (±0.19) 0.93 (±0.18) 1.04 (±0.23)
Meal 2 0.20 (±0.11) 0.30 (±0.15) 0.22 (±0.09) 0.57 (±0.23) 0.64 (±0.18)
Meal 1 + 2 0.85 (±0.28) 0.68 (±0.30) 0.79 (±0.24) 1.51 (±0.31) 1.68* (±0.34)
Meal duration (min)
Meal 1 5.9 (±2.7) 1.1 (±0.7) 3.1 (±1.2) 4.0 (±1.1) 5.9 (±1.9)
Meal 2 0.3 (±0.2) 0.8 (±0.5) 0.5 (±0.3) 2.4 (±1.5) 2.9 (±1.1)
Meal 1 + 2 6.2 (±2.7) 1.9 (±1.1) 3.6 (±1.3) 6.4 (±1.8) 8.7 (±2.3)
All meals 6.2 (±2.7) 3.0 (±1.5) 3.6 (±1.3) 8.7 (±2.7) 9.1 (±2.3)

Following administration of 240 mg/kg CBG, hour 2 and total food intake were increased, as was the size of meal 1 + 2. Total consumption was also increased following administration of 120 mg/kg CBG. Data presented as mean ± SEM and analysed by one-way repeated measures ANOVA and planned comparisons. All groups n = 16

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.01