Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 7;36(10):837–848. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0435-6

Table 3.

Comparison of procedural parameters among the control (warfarin), dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban groups

Procedural variables Warfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban P value
N = 90 N = 90 N = 90 N = 90
Presenting rhythm
 Sinus rhythm 59 % (53/90) 57 % (51/90) 58 % (52/90) 62 % (56/90) 0.88
 AF/AFL 41 % (37/90) 43 % (39/90) 42 % (38/90) 38 % (34/90)
Acute success 98 % (88/90) 98 % (88/90) 98 % (88/90) 99 % (89/90) 0.99
Procedure time (min) 110 ± 24 106 ± 24 105 ± 18 105 ± 20 0.41
Fluoroscopy time (min) 33 ± 9 33 ± 10 33 ± 6 33 ± 8 0.21
RF time (min) 35 ± 8 33 ± 8 33 ± 6 33 ± 8 0.20
Intraprocedural cardioversion 32 % (29/90) 29 % (26/90) 32 % (29/90) 31 % (28/90) 0.96
PVAI success 100 % (90/90) 100 % (90/90) 100 % (90/90) 100 % (90/90) 1

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation

AF atrial fibrillation, AFL atrial flutter, PVAI pulmonary vein atrium isolation, RF radiofrequency