Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 14;6:33318. doi: 10.1038/srep33318

Table 1. Summary of the total variants for each gene segment before and after background filtering and pairwise comparison between high-throughput sequencing- (HTS-) and Sanger-derived full-length sequences.

Segment/Gene /Length Background filtering
 
Before After Pairwise sequence comparison between HTS and Sanger
Total variants (minor + absolute) /No. of sequences Total variants (minor + absolute) /No. of sequences Total sequences compared Total minor variants found by HTS after filtering /No. of HTS sequences Total minor variants found by Sanger /No. of Sanger sequences No. of fully concordant sequences Total additional minor variants found by HTS /No. of sequences Total homogeneous variants compared to Sanger method after filtering /No. of sequences Total homogeneous variants correctly identified by HTS after re-visiting Sanger chromatogram/No. of sequences
1/PB2/2341nt 2968/148 2511/130 129 403/129 133/129 53 (41%) 270/75 0/0 0
2/PB1/2341nt 3035/148 2532/130 130 377/128 132/130 60 (46%) 247/65 9/8 2/2
3/PA/2233nt 2956/148 2641/136 135 513/136 138/135 49 (36%) 374/83 6/5 4/3
4/HA/1762nt 2016/148 1860/138 138 175/136 140/137 105 (76%) 37//30 3/3 1/1
5/NP/1566nt 1949/148 1839142 142 172/138 147/142 112 (79%) 32/26 7/5 4/2
6/NA/1467nt 1748/148 1638/140 140 173/138 144/140 115 (82%) 32/21 4/4 2/2
7/MP/1027nt 1206/148 1155/142 142 163/142 146/142 126 (89%) 18/15 1/1 1/1
8/NS/890nt 1114/148 1069/143 143 175/140 150/143 117 (82%) 28/22 4/4 1/1