Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 22;6(8):e227. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2016.34

Table 2. HR with 95% CI, for collection of T2DM-specific medications in the obese cohort.

  IFG i-ADA
IFG WHO
HbA1c prediabetes
  HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Prediabetes 1.72 0.84–3.52 0.14 3.73 1.87–7.45 0.0002 3.12 1.50–6.52 0.002
Girls vs boys 1.99 1.04–3.81 0.04 2.10 1.09–4.04 0.03 1.95 0.95–4 0.07
Non-Scandinavian vs Scandinavian 0.84 0.42–1.68 0.62 1.14 0.56–2.32 0.72 1.05 0.47–2.36 0.90
Degree of obesity 1.79 1.03–3.10 0.04 1.93 1.16–3.21 0.01 2.11 1.14–3.88 0.02

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HR, hazard ratio.

The models are adjusted for IFG (i-ADA in model 1 and WHO in model 2, n=1 620) and prediabetes according to Hba1c (model 3, n=1146), gender, ethnicity and degree of obesity. HR and 95% CI were calculated by the Cox's proportional hazards model. IFG i-ADA refers to 5.6–6.0 mmol l−1, WHO refers to fasting glucose level of ⩾6.1 mmol l−1, and prediabetic HbA1c refers to HbA1c 39–48 mmol l−1 (ADA definition). Bold numbers indicate statistical significance.