Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 13;11:123. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0473-8

Table 5.

Comparison of determinants and strategies identified by interviews before and after the delivery of the program

GE PL NW UK NL All
% (n) % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n)
Number of determinants identified after program delivery 32 8 24 10 15 89
 Thereof identified before 75 (24) 75 (6) 67 (16) 100 (10) 40 (6) 70 (62)
 Thereof prioritized (i.e., judged to be relevant and potentially modifiable) 69 (22) 38 (3) 29 (7) 80 (8) 0 45 (40)
 Thereof intended to be addressed by the program 50 (16) 38 (3) 25 (6) 80 (8) 0 37 (33)
Number of alternative strategies identified after program delivery 15 11 5 22 12 65
 Thereof identified before % (n) 67 (10) 18 (2) 80 (4) 46 (10) 75 (9) 54 (35)
 Thereof prioritized before (i.e., assessed as potentially effective and feasible, but not used in the final program) 20 (3) 18 (2) 0 18 (4) 33 (4) 20 (13)
Number and type of determinants not selected
 Patient factors 4 1 3 1 9
 Capacity for organizational change 1 2 1 4
 Incentives and resources 4 2 2 2 4 13
 Professional interactions 1 1 1 3 6
 Social, political, and legal factors 2 2
 Individual health care professional factors 6 1 8 1 16
 Not assigned to checklist 2 3 5
Number and type of strategies not prioritized
 Intervention development and delivery 6 3 9
 Change service sites 3 1 3 1 8
 Provision of materials 1 1 3 2 7
 Share local knowledge 2 1 2 1 6
 Change record systems 4 1 5
 Training 1 1 3 5
 Ongoing support 1 1 1 1 4
 Adaptions on patient level 2 2
 Revise professional roles 1 1 2
 Funding 1 1 2
 Provision of evidence 1 1
 External feedback 1 1

This table shows the quantitative analysis of the qualitative data presented in Additional file 4