Table 2.
μCT analysis of distal bone. μCT analysis of the hind paws was carried out as described in “Material and methods.” Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of four animals for each group which was then analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test
Age (weeks) | GENOT. | BV/TV | BMD | Tb Th | Tb N | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Femur | 6 | WT | 10.94 ± 0.7447 | p value = 0.037 | 0.144 ± 0.006 | p value = 0.055 | 0.044 ± 0.001 | p value = 0.815 | 2.493 ± 0.131 | p value = 0.036 |
A2BRKO | 7.97 ± 0.85 | 0.120 ± 0.008 | 0.044 ± 0.002 | 1.806 ± 0.218 | ||||||
12 | WT | 17.60 ± 2.67 | p value = 0.093 | 0.020 ± 0.024 | p value = 0.085 | 0.061 ± 0.005 | p value = 0.073 | 2.823 ± 0.223 | p value = 0.177 | |
A2BRKO | 12.10 ± 1.41 | 0.155 ± 0.012 | 0.050 ± 0.002 | 2.388 ± 0.188 | ||||||
19 | WT | 11.94 ± 1.37 | p value = 0.003 | 0.149 ± 0.007 | p value = 0.562 | 0.057 ± 0.003 | p value = 0.276 | 2.091 ± 0.127 | p value = 0.0001 | |
A2BRKO | 5.05 ± 0.25 | 0.155 ± 0.005 | 0.063 ± 0.004 | 0.812 ± 0.065 | ||||||
Tibia | 6 | WT | 7.28 ± 0.26 | p value = 0.061 | 0.114 ± 0.002 | p value = 0.088 | 0.041 ± 0.001 | p value = 0.501 | 1.782 ± 0.063 | p value = 0.015 |
A2BRKO | 5.48 ± 0.74 | 0.098 ± 0.008 | 0.043 ± 0.004 | 1.259 ± 0.142 | ||||||
12 | WT | 13.6 ± 1.761 | p value = 0.190 | 0.171 ± 0.017 | p value = 0.215 | 0.055 ± 0.003 | p value = 0.116 | 2.453 ± 0.199 | p value = 0.544 | |
A2BRKO | 10.40 ± 1.31 | 0.143 ± 0.013 | 0.049 ± 0.001 | 2.258 ± 0.229 | ||||||
19 | WT | 9.73 ± 0.97 | p value = 0.0003 | 0.123 ± 0.017 | p value = 0.853 | 0.054 ± 0.003 | p value = 0.157 | 1.780 ± 0.109 | p value = 0.0001 | |
A2BRKO | 2.28 ± 0.31 | 0.127 ± 0.012 | 0.061 ± 0.002 | 0.385 ± 0.072 |
Italicized numbers indicate values with a statistically significant p-value