Table 1.
Summary of best scored interfaces for the dopamine D2 receptor homodimer model
| Method of scoring | Scoring parameter (Figure) | Best scored interfaces |
|---|---|---|
| Normalized parameter values | Rosetta interface score (Fig. S1a) | (1) TM3-TM4-TM7-TM1 (2) TM2-TM3-TM2-TM3 (3) TM4-TM5-TM7-TM1 |
| Interface area (Fig. S1b) | (1) TM2-TM3-TM2-TM3 (2) TM4-TM5-TM4-TM5 (3) TM4-TM5-TM7-TM1 |
|
| Free energy of binding (Fig. S1c) | (1) TM2-TM3-TM2-TM3 (2) TM3-TM4-TM7-TM1 (3) TM5-TM6-TM5-TM6 |
|
| Hydrogen bond energy (Fig. S1d) | (1) TM3-TM4-TM3-TM4 (2) TM5-TM6-TM5-TM6 (3) TM4-TM5-TM5-TM6 |
|
| Consensus scoring (Fig. 2a) | (1) TM2-TM3-TM2-TM3 (2) TM4-TM5-TM7-TM1 (3) TM4-TM5-TM4-TM5 |
|
| Best model frequencies | Rosetta interface score (Fig. S2a) | (1) TM4-TM5-TM7-TM1 (2) TM3-TM4-TM5-TM6 (3) TM3-TM4-TM4-TM5 |
| Interface area (Fig. S2b) | (1) TM4-TM5-TM7-TM1 (2) TM3-TM4-TM4-TM5 (3) TM4-TM5-TM6-TM7 |
|
| Free energy of binding (Fig. S2c) | (1) TM4-TM5-TM7-TM1 (2) TM3-TM4-TM7-TM1 (3) TM3-TM4-TM5-TM6 |
|
| Hydrogen bond energy (Fig. S2d) | (1) TM4-TM5-TM5-TM6 (2) TM3-TM4-TM4-TM5 (3) TM3-TM4-TM7-TM1 |
|
| Consensus scoring (Fig. 2b) | (1) TM4-TM5-TM7-TM1 (2) TM3-TM4-TM4-TM5 (3) TM3-TM4-TM7-TM1 |