Skip to main content
. 2016 May 10;4(5):504–512. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.223

Table 2.

Clinical Sanger variants compared to whole‐exome sequencing (WES) variants in 42 adequately covered genes

Variants Total variants Concordant variants (%) Discordant variants (%) Number of patients
Coding 150 146 (97.3%) 4b (2.7%) 21
Intronic (≤20 bp) 52 48 (92.3%) 4 (7.7%) 13
Intronic (>20 bp) 58a 44 (75.9%) 13 (22.4%) 14

Genes with less than 75% coverage of more than 20× were excluded, eliminating CCD2D2A, DES, DOK7, EPM2A, FKRP, GAA, KCNC3, LMNA, and RAPSN from comparison.

a

One intronic variant was miscalled by both Sanger and WES by repeat Sanger sequencing; therefore, is neither concordant nor discordant.

b

One discordant coding variant was shown to be a false positive by repeat Sanger sequencing.