Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 23;15(7):1843–1854. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13182

Table 2.

Treatment differences in primary and secondary efficacy endpoints at Week 24

Parameters Arm 1 Arm 2 Arm 3 p‐value
Arm 1 vs Arm 2 Arm 1 vs Arm 3 Arm 2 vs Arm 3
Primary efficacy endpoint Renal function*, LS mean in mL/min/1.73m2
eGFR (MDRD4) 67.4 76.4 73.3 0.001 0.047 0.230
Secondary efficacy endpoint Renal function*, LS mean (n) in mL/min/1.73m2
CrCl (Cockcroft–Gault) 67.2 (278) 76.7 (283) 72.9 (269) < 0.001 0.071 0.152
eGFR (CKD‐EPI) 65.7 (278) 73.5 (283) 71.0 (269) 0.002 0.046 0.282
eGFR (cystatin C) 60.5 (209) 64.8 (204) 64.9 (193) 0.268 0.256 0.972
GFR (iohexol clearance) 56.5 (173) 56.9 (183) 52.6 (172) 0.945 0.445 0.401
Composite efficacy failure‐free survival, n (%) 210 (72.0) 227 (77.6) 206 (73.9) 0.065 0.726 0.161
Graft survival, n (%) 251 (86.5) 256 (87.7) 246 (88.6) 0.642 0.479 0.793
Patient survival, n (%) 259 (89.3) 260 (89.1) 251 (90.4) 0.948 0.668 0.617
Acute rejection, n (%)
Patients with AR 52 (18.0) 36 (12.4) 51 (18.4) 0.025 0.890 0.019
Rejection episode
0 235 (81.3) 252 (86.6) 223 (80.5)
1 46 (15.9) 34 (11.7) 47 (17.0)
2 8 (2.8) 4 (1.4) 7 (2.5)
3 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3) 0 (0.0)
BCAR, n (%)
Patients with BCAR 46 (17.9%) 30 (12.1%) 42 (16.8%) 0.016 0.782 0.039

*Analyses using FAS: n = 283, n = 287, n = 274 for Arms 1–3, respectively. Analyses using mITT: n = 289, n = 291, n = 277 for Arms 1–3.

Composite efficacy failure, graft and patient survival, acute rejection and BCAR were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier analysis. AR, acute rejection; BCAR, biopsy‐confirmed acute rejection; CKD‐EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; CrCl, creatinine clearance; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FAS, full‐analysis set; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; LS, least‐square; MDRD4, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease‐4; mITT, modified intent to treat.