Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct;106(10):1808–1814. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303301

TABLE 1—

Regression Results of All Items Served per Week at Full-Intervention, Minimal-Intervention, and Control Cafeterias Before and After the Interventions (Percentage of Total Items Served): Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2014

Comparison % Change (95% CI)
Red label
Full vs control
 Difference in immediate change after intervention 0.73 (–4.25, 5.71)
 Difference in change in slope after intervention –0.78 (–2.04, 0.49)
Full vs minimal
 Difference in immediate change after intervention 1.72 (–1.16, 4.60)
 Difference in change in slope after intervention –0.71 (–1.45, 0.02)
Minimal vs control
 Difference in immediate change after intervention –0.63 (–4.92, 3.66)
 Difference in change in slope after intervention –0.27 (–1.41, 0.86)
Yellow label
Full vs control
 Difference in immediate change after intervention 4.61 (–1.96, 11.17)
 Difference in change in slope after intervention –0.06 (–1.74, 1.62)
Full vs minimal
 Difference in immediate change after intervention 3.98 (–6.90, 14.87)
 Difference in change in slope after intervention –1.76 (–5.72, 2.19)
Minimal vs control
 Difference in immediate change after intervention 0.97 (–5.59, 7.54)
 Difference in change in slope after intervention 0.62 (–1.07, 2.31)
Green label
Full vs control
 Difference in immediate change after intervention –4.13 (–13.42, 5.16)
 Difference in change in slope after intervention 1.10 (–1.72, 3.92)
Full vs minimal
 Difference in immediate change after intervention –5.09 (–15.56, 5.38)
 Difference in change in slope after intervention 1.50 (–1.49, 4.48)
Minimal vs control
 Difference in immediate change after intervention –0.34 (–6.08, 5.41)
 Difference in change in slope after intervention –0.41 (–1.88, 1.07)

Note. CI = confidence interval.