TABLE 3—
Receipt of Genetic Counseling During and After the Intervention Period: Callers to California’s Every Woman Counts Service, 2010–2011
| Group and Type of Counseling | Counseled During Intervention Period, No. (%) | Counseled After Intervention Period, No. (%) | Total Counseled, No. (%) | Not Counseled, No. (%) |
| Control group (n = 44) | 2 (4.5) | 19 (43.2) | 21 (47.7) | 23 (52.3) |
| In person | 1 (50.0) | 4 (21.1) | 5 (23.8) | |
| Telephone | 1 (50.0) | 15 (78.9) | 16 (76.2) | |
| Intervention group (n = 44) | 17 (38.6) | 13 (29.6) | 30 (68.2) | 14 (31.8) |
| In person | 12 (70.6) | 3 (25.0) | 15 (51.7) | |
| Telephone | 5 (29.4) | 9 (75.0) | 14 (48.3) | |
| Total | 19 (21.6) | 32 (36.4) | 51 (58.0) | 37 (42.0) |
Note. Type of counseling (telephone or in person) was missing for 1 intervention group participant. χ2 P = .001 for comparison of study arms with respect to final counseling status (counseled during the intervention period, counseled after the intervention period, not counseled).