Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 15;113(35):9876–9881. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604921113

Table 1.

Overview of mating combinations between different M. canettii and M. tuberculosis strains

M. canettii Hygr donor strains Kmr receipient strains MTBC Hygr donor strains Kmr receipient strains
Mcan-A,
Mcan-K,
Mcan-K, Mtb-H37Rv Mcan-L,
Mcan-A Mcan-L, Mcan-J,
Mtb-H37Rv, Mtb-79112,
H37RvΔRD1 Mtb-Tb36
Mcan-A,
Mcan-K,
Mcan-I Mcan-L, Mtb-79112 Mtb-H37Rv
Mtb-H37Rv, Mtb-Tb36
H37RvΔRD1
Mcan-A,
Mcan-K, Mtb-Tb36 Mtb-H37Rv
Mcan-J Mcan-L, Mtb-79112
Mtb-H37Rv,
H37RvΔRD1
Mcan-A, Mcan-A,
Mcan-K Mcan-L, H37RvΔRD1 Mcan-K,
Mtb-H37Rv, Mcan-L,
H37RvΔRD1 Mtb-H37Rv
Mcan-A,
Mcan-L Mcan-K,
Mtb-H37Rv,
H37RvΔRD1,

Donor strains carrying the pYUB412 or F10 cosmid were used, as well as recipient strains carrying the pMRF1-dsRed replicative plasmid, except for M. canettii J, which contains an integrative pMV306.Kan plasmid-mediated insertion, due to a putative restricted plasmid maintenance, linked to the presence of the eptABCD gene cluster. M. canettii donor strains A, K, L, and I additionally carried spontaneous rifampicin resistance mutations. Only for mating pair M. canettii A and M. canettii L recombinants (bold) were obtained.