Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 23;30(10):3378–3387. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600473R

TABLE 1.

Biometric and metabolic data assessed by CLAMS of NaPi2a−/− mice on LPD and HPD for 10 wk and of WT mice on RC and LPD for 2 wk

Parameter NaPi2a−/− diet for 10 wk
WT diet for 2 wk
WT on RC LPD HPD P (LPD vs. HPD) RC LPD P (RC vs. LPD)
Body weight (g) 27.4 ± 0.5 25.7 ± 0.9 28.8 ± 1.3 28.1 ± 0.9 26.1 ± 0.3
Muscle mass (g) 20.5 ± 0.5 17.4 ± 0.5 19.1 ± 0.6 0.05 21.4 ± 0.3 20.3 ± 0.2 0.03
Fat mass (g) 1.5 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.2 4.3 ± 0.7 3.0 ± 0.3 2.1 ± 0.3
Muscle mass (%) 74.9 ± 0.7 67.8 ± 0.5 67.0 ± 1.2 76.4 ± 2.0 77.6 ± 0.9
Fat mass (%) 5.5 ± 0.8 11.0 ± 0.7 14.0 ± 1.7 10.6 ± 0.8 8.1 ± 1.0
VO2 (ml/kg/h) 2972.4 ± 38.0 3439.4 ± 93.6 3350.0 ± 136.8 3300.9 ± 27.7 3422.2 ± 25.0 <0.01
VCO2 (ml/kg/h) 2719.7 ± 38.0 3145.5 ± 79.3 3112.7 ± 149.0 3166.9 ± 24.8 3408.5 ± 27.7 <0.01
RER 0.91 ± 0.01 0.91 ± 0.01 0.92 ± 0.01 0.96 ± 0.01 0.99 ± 0.01 <0.01
Energy expenditure (Kcal/kg/h) 14.6 ± 0.2 17.0 ± 0.4 16.2 ± 0.5 16.5 ± 0.1 17.2 ± 0.1 <0.01
Energy intake (Kcal/kg/h) 17.5 ± 0.5 23.2 ± 2.4 23.2 ± 1.2 26.7 ± 1.5 36.6 ± 2.5 <0.01
Activity index (counts/min) 158.5 ± 19.4 78.1 ± 8.9 109.7 ± 7.8 0.01 52.5 ± 2.4 44.1 ± 1.5 <0.05

All data are means ± sem; n = 8–10 in each group. P values are indicated when significant by double-sided Student’s t test. RC, regular chow (0.7% Pi, 1.0% Ca). See Fig. 1 for composition of LPD and HPD.