Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 15;11(9):e0161749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161749

Table 4. Primary and secondary outcomes at 90 days.

Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise.

Outcomes 30s Group (n = 673) 60s Group (n = 611) 90s Group (n = 595) Control Group (n = 547) Group difference P value# Intervention/control difference P value##
Continued (hot-to) cold shower after first 30 days* 446 (66) 378 (63) 363 (62) N.A. 0.355 N.A.
Median (interquartile range) frequency of cold shower (times per week)* 3 (0–7) 3 (0–7) 2 (0–6) N.A. 0.727 N.A.
Median (interquartile range) duration of cold shower (s)* 30 (10–50) 60 (40–80) 60 (10–110) N.A. <0.001 N.A.
Will to continue (hot-to) cold shower after 90 days** 546 (88) 487 (84) 490 (85) N.A. 0.199 N.A.
Median (interquartile range) SF-36 physical component score 85.8 (78.9–90.4) 86.4 (79.4–92) 87.2 (79.8–92) 86.4 (78.5–91.4) 0.121 0.338
Median (interquartile range) SF-36 mental component score 84.8 (76.7–89.6) 84.4 (75.7–90.2) 85.8 (78.0–90.6) 84.4 (74.3–90) 0.108 0.090
Median (interquartile range) work engagement score 41 (33–46) 42 (32–46) 42 (32–46) 41 (31.3–46) 0.638 0.389
Median (interquartile range) anxiety score 1 (0–3) 1 (0–3) 1 (0–3) 1 (0–3) 0.190 0.133
Reason of sickness absence if longer than 5 days*** 0.326
Influenza 27 (64) 17 (46) 13 (42) 20 (51)
Psychosocial (including burnout) 6 (14) 7 (19) 6 (19) 5 (13)
Musculoskeletal Injury 4 (10) 4 (11) 2 (6) 3 (8)
Bronchitis/pneumonia 3 (7) 0 (0) 3 (10) 2 (5)
Other upper respiratory tract infection (excluding influenza) 2 (5) 0 (0) 2 (6) 2 (5)
Other infection(s) 0 (0) 5 (14) 1 (3) 3 (8)
  Other comorbidity (including operation) 0 (0) 4 (11) 4 (13) 4 (10)    

This study investigated the effect of cold showering on health and work: a trial randomizing a (hot-to-) cold shower for 30, 60, 90 seconds or a control group during 30 consecutive days followed by 60 days of showering cold at their own discretion for the intervention groups.

N.A. Not applicable

* Missing data in 2 participants in 30s Group, and 2 participants in 60s Group

** Missing data in 56, 30, and 20 participants (respectively)

*** Data collected in 42, 37, 31, and 39 participants (respectively)

# Difference between all groups (Kruskal Wallis)

## Difference between all interventional groups versus control group (Mann-Whitney U)