Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 15;11(9):e0162565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162565

Table 1. The Demographic Data and Conventional MR Imaging Features of GBMs and PCLs.

GBM (n = 104) PCL (n = 22) P-value
Age (y/o), median (Q1,Q3) 60 (47, 70.3) 59 (54.3, 71.8) 0.57
Gender, n (%) 0.24
     Male 58 (55.8%) 9 (41%)
     Female 46 (44.2%) 13 (59%)
Metastasis at diagnosis 0.32
      Yes 1 (1%) 1 (4.5%)
      No 103 (99%) 21 (95.5%)
Tumor size (cm), median (Q1,Q3) 5.2 (4, 6) 3.5 (2.6, 4.3) < 0.01*
Tumor location, n (%) 0.02*
    Frontal 38 (36.5%) 9 (41%)
    Parietal 25 (24%) 3 (14%)
    Temporal 27 (26%) 2 (9%)
    Occipital 3 (2.9%) 0 (0)
    Basal ganglia 2 (1.9%) 4 (18%)
    Corpus callosum 3 (2.9%) 2 (9%)
    Thalamus 5 (4.8%) 1 (4.5%)
    Brainstem 1 (1%) 1 (4.5%)
Tumor margin, n (%) < 0.01*
  Smooth 5 (4.8%) 10 (45%)
  Irregular 99 (95.2%) 12 (55%)
Multiplicity, n (%) 0.26
      Yes 21 (20.2%) 7 (32%)
      No 83 (79.8%) 15 (68%)
Daughter nodule, n (%) 0.08
      Yes 22 (21.2%) 1 (4.5%)
        No 82 (78.9%) 21 (95.5%)
Tumor necrosis, n (%) < 0.01*
      Yes 101 (97.1%) 8 (36.4%)
      No 3 (2.9%) 14 (63.6%)
Tumor enhancement, n (%) 1
      Yes 104 (100%) 22 (100%)
      No 0 0
Peritumoral edema, n (%) 1
      Yes 97 (93.3%) 21 (95.5%)
      No 7 (6.7%) 1 (4.5%)

* Statistical difference (P<0.05) in Fisher exact test or Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test.