Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 15;11(9):e0162349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162349

Table 3. Study results from rheometry.

Testing method Author (year) [reference] Time from wounding to intervention Time from intervention to biomechanical testing Dynamic viscosity comparisons in scarred groups* P—value Elastic modulus comparisons in scarred groups* P—value
Parallel plate rheometry Hertegård et al (2006) [20] 0 days 4 weeks Saline vs. MSC injection P = 0.07 Saline versus MSC injection P < 0.01
Parallel plate rheometry Svensson et al (2010) [24] 0 days 3 months Saline vs. MSC injection P < 0.05 Saline versus MSC injection P < 0.05
Parallel plate rheometry Svensson et al (2011) [25] 9 weeks 10 weeks Saline vs. MSC P = 0.03 Saline versus MSC injection P < 0.001
Parallel plate rheometry Kim et al (2013) [21] 0 days 1–3 months PBS vs. MSC P = 0.2 PBS versus MSC P = 0.34
Parallel plate rheometry Kim et al (2014) [22] 0 days 1 and 3 months
  1. PBS vs. MSC

  2. PBS vs. MSC + HA/ALG

  1. Not reported

  2. P < 0.01

  1. PBS versus MSC

  2. PBS versus MSC + HA/ALG

  1. Not reported

  2. P < 0.01

* Only comparisons deemed relevant are reported.