Table 2.
Y | Model | b | SE | t | p | CI (lower) | CI (upper) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PSWQ →S-AIS (a) | .175 | .049 | 3.550 | .0004 | .078 | .272 |
S-AIS → FTND (b) | .055 | .010 | 5.451 | < .0001 | .035 | .075 | |
PSWQ → FTND (c’) | .015 | .011 | 1.357 | .176 | −.007 | .0336 | |
PSWQ → FTND (c) | .024 | .011 | 2.211 | .028 | .003 | .046 | |
PSWQ → S-AIS → FTND (a*b) | .010 | .003 | .004 | .017 | |||
2 | S-AIS → MASC (b) | .145 | .032 | 4.562 | < .0001 | .083 | .208 |
PSWQ → MASC (c’) | −.028 | .034 | −.812 | .417 | −.094 | .039 | |
PSWQ → MASC(c) | −.002 | .034 | −.065 | .948 | −.070 | .065 | |
PSWQ → S-AIS → MASC (a*b) | .025 | .009 | .011 | .048 | |||
3 | S-AIS → BCS (b) | .510 | .039 | 12.986 | < .0001 | .433 | .588 |
PSWQ → BCS (c’) | .094 | .042 | 2.239 | .026 | .012 | .177 | |
PSWQ → BCS (c) | .183 | .048 | 3.785 | .0002 | .088 | .278 | |
PSWQ → S-AIS → BCS (a*b) | .089 | .025 | .042 | .139 | |||
4 | S-AIS → PROB (b) | .018 | .003 | 6.911 | < .0001 | .013 | .023 |
PSWQ → PROB (c’) | .005 | .003 | 1.650 | .099 | −.001 | .010 | |
PSWQ → PROB (c) | .001 | .003 | 2.685 | .008 | .002 | .014 | |
PSWQ → S-AIS → PROB (a*b) | .003 | .001 | .002 | .005 |
Note. Path a is equal across all models; therefore, it presented only in the model with Y1 to avoid redundancies. N for analyses of models Y1–Y3 included 466 cases. Analyses for Y4 include 432 cases (those reporting ≥ 1 lifetime quit attempts). The standard error and 95% CI for a*b are obtained by bootstrap with 10,000 re-samples. PSWQ (trait worry) is the predictor variable (X), S-AIS (Smoking-related affective Inflexibility) is the explanatory variable (M), and FTND (nicotine dependence; Y1), MASC (motivational aspects of quitting; Y2), BCS (barriers to smoking cessation; Y3), and PROB (severity of quit problems; Y4) are the criterion variables. CI (lower) = lower bound of a 95% confidence interval; CI (upper) = upper bound; → = affects.