Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Med. 2014 Nov 14;42(4):254–263. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2014.984650

Table 2.

Regression results for the tested models.

Y Model b SE t p CI (lower) CI (upper)
1 PSWQ →S-AIS (a) .175 .049 3.550 .0004 .078 .272
S-AIS → FTND (b) .055 .010 5.451 < .0001 .035 .075
PSWQ → FTND (c’) .015 .011 1.357 .176 −.007 .0336
PSWQ → FTND (c) .024 .011 2.211 .028 .003 .046
PSWQ → S-AIS → FTND (a*b) .010 .003 .004 .017

2 S-AIS → MASC (b) .145 .032 4.562 < .0001 .083 .208
PSWQ → MASC (c’) −.028 .034 −.812 .417 −.094 .039
PSWQ → MASC(c) −.002 .034 −.065 .948 −.070 .065
PSWQ → S-AIS → MASC (a*b) .025 .009 .011 .048

3 S-AIS → BCS (b) .510 .039 12.986 < .0001 .433 .588
PSWQ → BCS (c’) .094 .042 2.239 .026 .012 .177
PSWQ → BCS (c) .183 .048 3.785 .0002 .088 .278
PSWQ → S-AIS → BCS (a*b) .089 .025 .042 .139

4 S-AIS → PROB (b) .018 .003 6.911 < .0001 .013 .023
PSWQ → PROB (c’) .005 .003 1.650 .099 −.001 .010
PSWQ → PROB (c) .001 .003 2.685 .008 .002 .014
PSWQ → S-AIS → PROB (a*b) .003 .001 .002 .005

Note. Path a is equal across all models; therefore, it presented only in the model with Y1 to avoid redundancies. N for analyses of models Y1–Y3 included 466 cases. Analyses for Y4 include 432 cases (those reporting ≥ 1 lifetime quit attempts). The standard error and 95% CI for a*b are obtained by bootstrap with 10,000 re-samples. PSWQ (trait worry) is the predictor variable (X), S-AIS (Smoking-related affective Inflexibility) is the explanatory variable (M), and FTND (nicotine dependence; Y1), MASC (motivational aspects of quitting; Y2), BCS (barriers to smoking cessation; Y3), and PROB (severity of quit problems; Y4) are the criterion variables. CI (lower) = lower bound of a 95% confidence interval; CI (upper) = upper bound; → = affects.