Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 19;5:e15133. doi: 10.7554/eLife.15133

Figure 4. Estimation of vesicle diffusion coefficients Dshort and Dlong.

(A) Parameter search for the best match between the average drift-corrected control FRAP data (Figure 2C) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations (Figure 3C,D) across a range of Dshort and % immobile vesicles, expressed as log(χ2). Black star denotes smallest χ2 (Dshort = 0.060 µm2/s, 25% immobile vesicles). Ellipse denotes 68.3% confidence region for two degrees of freedom (χ2 < 2.30). The vesicle step size (dr = 2 nm) was sufficiently small to avoid discretization error and the simulation space (a 2 µm cube) was sufficiently large to avoid boundary effects (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). (B) Best-match simulation (red) compared to control FRAP data (open circles). Gray denotes 68.3% confidence. (C) D(t) for best-match conditions in A with steady-state value (Dlong = 0.025 µm2/s; black dashed line) computed from a double-exponential fit for t > 10 ms. Inset, D(t) on a logarithmic timescale with average time to first collision (gray dashed line, 0.46 ms) when steric interactions start to reduce vesicle mobility. (D) Same as B but with added best-match finite-difference (FD) simulation with Dlong = 0.028 µm2/s (blue). Log(χ2) = 0.8 (MC) and 0.5 (FD).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.016

Figure 4—source data 1. Parameters file for best-match Monte-Carlo FRAP simulation.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.15133.017

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Comparison of Monte Carlo FRAP curves for different vesicle step size and simulation cube size.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A) Average FRAP curves for vesicle step size dr = 1 and 2 nm (blue and red; see Equation 3) for best-match conditions in Figure 4B (2 µm cube geometries) showing a close overlap and therefore little discretization error for the simulation with dr = 2 nm. (B) The simulation in A for dr = 2 nm inside a 2 µm cube (red) was repeated inside a 3 µm cube (green), with both FRAP curves also showing a close overlap. Hence, a 2 µm cube is sufficiently large to avoid boundary effects and simulate the large interior of a MFT.