Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Jul 25;30(6):672–679. doi: 10.1037/adb0000202

Table 2.

Three regression models examining different predictors of PHT in alcohol offer scenes (n = 83).

Predictor B SE (95% CI) R2 p
AEQ-A scales 0.11 0.254
 Global positive effects 0.37 0.61 (−0.84, 1.58) 0.548
 Social behavior enhancement −0.33 0.50 (−1.34, 0.67) 0.510
 Cognitive-behavioral enhancement −1.24 0.78 (−2.80, 0.32) 0.118
 Sexual enhancement 0.64 1.18 (−1.72, 3.00) 0.589
 Cognitive-behavioral impairment 0.20 0.41 (−0.62, 1.02) 0.628
 Increased arousal −0.86 1.12 (−3.08, 1.37) 0.446
 Relaxation/tension-reduction −0.76 0.72 (−2.20, 0.68) 0.298

Lifetime alcohol use 0.00 0.01 (−0.02, 0.02) 0.00 0.959

Past 30 day alcohol use −0.40 0.48 (−1.35, 0.55) 0.01 0.404

Note: Each of the three predictor classes (AEQ-A scales, lifetime alcohol use, and past 30 day alcohol use) were entered into separate regression models, with the dotted lines indicating separate models. CI = confidence interval, PHT = percent healthy talk, AEQ-A = Adolescent Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire.