Table 6.
Relationships among particulars in Scenario 1
| IUI | Relation | IUI | When relation holds in reality | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUI-4 | part of | IUI-3 | at t4 | |
| IUI-5 | part of | IUI-4 | at t14 | All anatomical components in which the cognitive representation inheres are part of the cognitive system. We do not assume the cognitive system is limited to the brain, as the state of neuroscience does not permit such an assumption. |
| IUI-6 | inheres in | IUI-5 | at t6 | |
| IUI-6 | is about | IUI-7 | at t6 | The cognitive representation stands in aboutness to IUI-7 as long as it exists |
| IUI-6 | is about | IUI-1 | at t6 | It is also about Mr. Jones |
| IUI-6 | is about | IUI-2 | at t6 | And about Mr. Jones’ disease |
| IUI-6 | is about | UUI-1 | at t6 | And about Type 2 diabetes mellitus |
| IUI-6 | concretizes | IUI-8 | at t6 | It also concretizes the diagnosis |
| IUI-10 | inheres in | IUI-9 | at t9 | The IQE inheres in the sentence on paper |
| IUI-10 | is about | IUI-7 | at t10 | The IQE stands in aboutness to IUI-7 |
| IUI-10 | is about | IUI-1 | at t10 | It is also about Mr. Jones |
| IUI-10 | is about | IUI-2 | at t10 | And about Mr. Jones’ disease |
| IUI-10 | is about | UUI-1 | at t10 | And about Type 2 diabetes mellitus |
| IUI-10 | concretizes | IUI-8 | at t10 | |
| IUI-10 | is conformant to | IUI-6 | at t10 | Is conformant to the cognitive representation as long as it exists |
| IUI-3 | agent in | IUI-11 | at t11 | |
| IUI-12 | input into | IUI-11 | at t15 | Clinical picture input into IUI-11 |
| IUI-6 | output of | IUI-11 | at t16 | Cognitive representation output from IUI-11 |
| IUI-8 | output of | IUI-11 | at t16 | Both the diagnosis and its concretization are outputs of IUI-11 |
| IUI-8 | input into | IUI-13 | at t17 | The diagnosis is input into writing |
| IUI-6 | input into | IUI-13 | at t18 | As is its cognitive representation |
| IUI-10 | output of | IUI-13 | at t19 | The sentence is output of writing |