Table 1.
COMPONENT | RANGE OF SCORES | SCORING CRITERIA |
---|---|---|
Adequacyc | 0 to 60 points | |
Total vegetables and fruit | 0 to 10 points | Minimum: 0 |
Maximum: 4 to 10 servingsb | ||
Whole fruit | 0 to 5 points | Minimum: 0 |
Maximum: 0.8 to 2.1 servings (21 % of recommendation for total vegetables and fruit)b | ||
Dark green and orange vegetables | 0 to 5 points | Minimum: 0 |
Maximum: 0.8 to 2.1 servings (21 % of recommendation for total vegetables and fruit)b | ||
Total grain products | 0 to 5 points | Minimum: 0 |
Maximum: 1.5 to 4 servings (50 % of recommendation for total grain products)b | ||
Milk and alternatives | 0 to 10 points | Minimum: 0 |
Maximum: 2 to 4 servingsb | ||
Meat and alternatives | 0 to 10 points | Minimum: 0 |
Maximum: 1 to 3 servings (75 to 225 g)b | ||
Unsaturated fats | 0 to 10 points | Minimum: 0 |
Maximum: 30 to 45gramsb | ||
Moderationd | 0 to 40 points | |
Saturated fats | 8 to 10 points | Maximum 7 % to 10 % of total energy intake |
0 to 8 points | ||
Sodium | 8 to 10 points | Adequate intake to tolerable upper intake level |
0 to 8 points | ||
“Other food” | 0 to 20 points | Minimum: 5 % or less of total energy intake Maximum: 40 % or total energy intake |
aGarriguet, D., 2009. Diet quality in Canada. Heal. Reports 20, 41–52 [22]
baccording to age and sex, as specified in Canada’s Food Guide
cfor adequacy components, 0 points for minimum or less, 5 or 10 maximum or more, and proportional for amounts between minimum and maximum
dfor moderation components, 10 or 20 points for minimum or less, 0 points for maximum or more, and proportionally between minimum and maximum