Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 16;128(11):1516–1524. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-715342

Table 3.

Risk of sclerosis in patients with chronic GVHD, according to SNPs in donors and recipients

Genome Gene SNP Alleles* N Model Groups compared Unadjusted Adjusted
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Donor BANK1 rs10516487 T/C 807 Allelic TT vs TC vs CC 0.83 (0.66-1.04) .11 0.84 (0.67-1.05) .12
Dominant TT or TC vs CC 0.91 (0.68-1.20) .50 0.92 (0.69-1.22) .55
Recessive TT vs TC or CC 0.43 (0.21-0.88) .02 0.43 (0.21-0.87) .02
Donor CD247 rs2056626 G/T 808 Allelic GG vs GT vs TT 1.23 (1.01-1.51) .04 1.23 (1.00-1.51) .04
Dominant GG or GT vs TT 1.58 (1.14-2.18) .006 1.57 (1.13-2.18) .007
Recessive GG vs GT or TT 1.05 (0.72-1.53) .82 1.04 (0.71-1.53) .84
Recipient CD247 rs2056626 G/T 776 Allelic GG vs GT vs TT 1.27 (1.04-1.55) .02 1.24 (1.01-1.52) .04
Dominant GG or GT vs TT 1.62 (1.17-2.24) .004 1.66 (1.19-2.32) .003
Recessive GG vs GT or TT 1.13 (0.78-1.64) .53 1.04 (0.71-1.52) .85
Donor HLA-DPA1 rs987870 C/T 793 Allelic CC vs CT vs TT 0.89 (0.66-1.20) .45 0.89 (0.66-1.20) .44
Dominant CC or CT vs TT 0.77 (0.55-1.07) .12 0.76 (0.54-1.06) .11
Recessive CC vs CT or TT 2.44 (1.20-4.96) .01 2.50 (1.22-5.11) .01
Recipient HLA-DPA1 rs987870 C/T 767 Allelic CC vs CT vs TT 0.81 (0.59-1.12) .20 0.84 (0.61-1.15) .28
Dominant CC or CT vs TT 0.69 (0.49-0.99) .04 0.72 (0.50-1.03) .07
Recessive CC vs CT or TT 2.17 (1.02-4.63) .04 2.13 (1.00-4.54) .05
*

The first allele is designated as the minor allele and the second allele is designated as the major allele.

Adjusted for stem cell graft source, HLA matching, ABO compatibility, TBI dose, and principal components.