Skip to main content
. 2016 May 20;35:14. doi: 10.1186/s41043-016-0049-x

Table 2.

Distribution of consanguineous unions, total marriages, and IC-F across geographic location, mother tongue, and caste systems

Variable Consanguineous unions Total marriages Bivariate logistic regression OR IC-F
No % No %
Tehsils*
 Sadiqabad 527 56.0 941 43.3 1.00 0.0342
 Rahim Yar Khan 377 63.0 598 27.5 1.34* 0.0386
 Khanpur 328 56.8 578 26.6 1.03 0.0342
 Liaquatpur 39 68.4 57 2.6 1.70 0.0367
 Total 1271 58.5 2174 100.0 0.0355
Rural/urban origin*
 Rural 844 60.7 1390 63.9 1.29* 0.0370
 Urban 427 54.5 784 36.1 1.00 0.0327
Mother tongue*
 Punjabi 499 45.2 1105 50.8 1.00 0.0278
 Saraiki 706 75.4 937 43.1 3.71* 0.0454
 Urdu 23 46.0 50 2.3 0.99 0.0275
 Others 43 52.4 82 3.8 1.66 0.0309
Caste system** (n = 1501)*
 Araina 239 39.0 613 28.2 1.00 0.0239
 Malikb 67 77.9 86 4.0 5.52* 0.0458
 Arainb 54 80.6 67 3.1 6.50* 0.0483
 Balouchb 50 58.1 86 4.0 2.17* 0.0338
 Bhattib 37 74.0 50 2.3 4.45* 0.0441
 Juta 49 45.0 109 5.0 1.28 0.0288
 Khokharb 41 91.1 45 2.1 16.04* 0.0535
 Larrb 37 84.1 44 2.0 8.27* 0.0526
 Malika 28 58.3 48 2.2 2.19* 0.0332
 Mughala 22 51.2 43 2.0 1.64 0.0334
 Rajputa 72 53.7 134 6.2 1.82* 0.0332
 Sheikhb 37 80.4 46 2.1 6.43* 0.0530

aPredominantly Punjabi speaking

bPredominantly Saraiki speaking

^Pushto speaking

*Distribution was statistically significant; **caste systems with sample size ≥42 are shown