Table 19. Comparison results of the proposed FER system with the proposed MEMM model against some stat-of-the-art works (Unit: %).

Previous FER Systems	Average Recognition Rates	Standard Deviation
[40]	82	±3.1
[41]	88	±4.5
[16]	87	±3.7
[42]	92	±2.1
[18]	90	±1.9
Proposed FER System	97	±1.3