Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2016 Aug;28(3):801–818. doi: 10.1017/S0954579416000328

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Results for binary outcomes

6-year Binary Outcome (% endorsement, FBP vs. Self-study) % FBP % Self-study Unstandardized Program Effect [95% CI] Odds Ratio of Program Effect [95% CI] False Discovery Rate— Adjusted p Value Number Needed to Treat (NNT)
BDI Diagnosis – Mild Depression 22.6% 35.9% −1.09* [−2.03, −0.14] 0.34 [0.13, 0.87] .045 7.54
CIDI-Depression Diagnosis 19.4% 26.4% −0.78 [−1.67, 0.10] 0.46 [0.19, 1.11] .084 14.16
Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder (symptom criteria) 4.8% 23.5% −2.53** [−3.99, −1.07] 0.08 [0.02, 0.34] .040 5.35
Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder with Impairment 0% 11.8% NA NA NA 8.50
SMAST-Possible Alcoholism 1.6% 15.1% −2.40* [−4.65, −0.16] 0.09 [0.01,0.63] .045 7.41

Abbreviations: BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; CIDI-SF, Composite International Diagnostic Interview (Short Form); SMAST, Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test; CI, confidence interval.

p < 0.10,

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01

NA – not applicable because there was no parent in the FBP group that had the disorders and endorsed the impairment item.