Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct;59(4 Suppl):S29–S39. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.022

Table 3.

Summary of findings for the effect of nutrition interventions for pregnant adolescents

Quality assessment
Summary of findings
Number of studies Design Limitations Consistency Directness
Number of events
RR/SMD (95% CI)
Generalizability to population of interest Generalizability to intervention of interest Intervention Control
Mean birth weight: lowa outcome-specific quality of evidence
 8 RCT/quasi Six studies not randomized, selective reporting of outcomes in one study Only one study suggests benefit
Moderate heterogeneity, I2 = 50%
All studies targeted pregnant adolescents Interventions included nutritional supplementation and counseling 1,634 1,513 .25 (.08–.41)
Low birth weight (<2,500 g): lowa outcome-specific quality of evidence
 9 Quasi None of the studies were randomized Five studies suggest benefit
Considerable heterogeneity, I2 = 67%
All studies targeted pregnant adolescents Interventions included nutritional supplementation and counseling 416 1,011 .70 (.57–.84)
Serum calcium: moderatea outcome-specific quality of evidence
 2 RCT Selective reporting of outcomes in both studies No study suggests benefit
Low heterogeneity, I2 = 33%
All studies targeted pregnant adolescents Interventions included nutritional supplementation and counseling 49 46 −.17 (−.58 to .23)
Preterm birth (before 37 weeks): lowa outcome-specific quality of evidence
 2 RCT/quasi One study not randomized, selective reporting of outcomes in one study One study suggests benefit
Considerable heterogeneity, I2 = 74%
All studies targeted pregnant adolescents Interventions included nutritional supplementation and counseling 294 569 .73 (.57–.95)
Iron deficiency anemia: lowa outcome-specific quality of evidence
 1 RCT Selective reporting of outcomes in one study Only one study All studies targeted pregnant adolescents Interventions included nutritional supplementation and counseling 4 10 .34 (.13–.89)

CI = confidence interval; RCT = randomized controlled trial; RR = relative risk; SMD = standard mean difference.

a

Downgraded for study design and heterogeneity.