Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 17;57(11):1218–1226. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12549

Table 2.

CBT for Adolescent ADHD

Observed Data Multiple Imputationsa

Outcomes Time-Months Initial Study Assignment
Estimated Effect of CBT on Outcomes (95% Confidence Interval) p-value Estimated Effect of CBT on Outcomes (95% Coverage Intervalb)
Wait List CBT

WL/CBT mean +/- SD (n) WL/CBT mean +/- SD (n)
CGI 0 WL 4.64 +/- 0.85 (22) WL 4.75 +/- 0.68 (24) -1.18 (-1.31, -1.05)c
4 WL 4.55 +/- 0.80 (22) CBT 3.71 +/- 0.85 (21) -1.17 (-1.39, -0.94)
p<.0001 (***)
8 CBT 3.20 +/- 0.86 (15) CBT 3.71 +/- 0.96 (21)

Parent Rating-Total 0 WL 28.05 +/- 9.57 (22) WL 25.30 +/- 9.17 (24) -11.47 (-12.50, -10.44-)c
4 WL 24.18 +/- 8.23 (22) CBT 16.76 +/- 10.40 (21) -10.93 (-12.93,-8.93)
p<.0001 (***)
8 CBT 12.82 +/- 6.51 (15) CBT 13.71 +/- 9.65 (21)

Adolescent Rating-Total 0 WL 14.41 +/- 8.35 (22) WL 16.46 +/- 10.90 (24) -5.81 (-6.50, -5.11)c
4 WL 13.86 +/- 8.12 (22) CBT 11.95 +/- 8.89 (21) -5.24 (-7.21, -3.28)
p<.0001 (***)
8 CBT 7.42 +/- 3.71 (15) CBT 9.71 +/- 7.21 (21)

Notes:

a

This set of results is from a mixed model using multiple imputations to estimate the main effects of treatment and group assignment on the outcome.

b

The estimated 95% coverage interval is the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the sampling distribution of the estimated effects.

c

In an analysis of 100 data sets with imputed values for cases with missing data, there was a statistically significant (p<0.0001) effect of CBT on this outcome in all 100 iterations.

Abbreviations: WL-Waitlist, CBT-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, SD-Standard Deviation, CGI-Clinical Global Impression