Table 1.

Comparison of theoretical and empirical power with the following design parameters held fixed: c = 2, S = 5 (or I = 10), p = 2, and σ² = 1.

Δ	b	J	K	N=IJK	ρ1	ρ2	φ	$\stackrel{\sim }{\phi }$ a	K~U(a, b)	$\stackrel{\sim }{\phi }$ b
0.3	0	10	5	500	0.3	0.1	0.539	0.559	U(2, 8)	0.548
						0.2	0.688	0.698		0.652
					0.4	0.1	0.457	0.500		0.479
						0.2	0.564	0.567		0.543
			10	1000	0.3	0.1	0.637	0.655	U(3, 17)	0.643
						0.2	0.829	0.839		0.804
					0.4	0.1	0.516	0.540		0.557
						0.2	0.653	0.647		0.651
	2	12	5	600	0.3	0.1	0.700	0.697	U(2, 8)	0.685
						0.2	0.841	0.836		0.817
					0.4	0.1	0.609	0.641		0.620
						0.2	0.726	0.753		0.723
			10	1200	0.3	0.1	0.796	0.824	U(3, 17)	0.800
						0.2	0.940	0.931		0.920
					0.4	0.1	0.676	0.682		0.678
						0.2	0.811	0.815		0.802
0.4	0	10	5	500	0.3	0.1	0.783	0.802	U(2, 8)	0.813
						0.2	0.904	0.911		0.903
					0.4	0.1	0.695	0.730		0.712
						0.2	0.807	0.821		0.777
			10	1000	0.3	0.1	0.868	0.858	U(3, 17)	0.875
						0.2	0.973	0.983		0.972
					0.4	0.1	0.760	0.809		0.792
						0.2	0.881	0.903		0.902
	2	12	5	600	0.3	0.1	0.912	0.913	U(2, 8)	0.910
						0.2	0.976	0.974		0.971
					0.4	0.1	0.846	0.853		0.842
						0.2	0.927	0.930		0.921
			10	1200	0.3	0.1	0.961	0.970	U(3, 17)	0.949
						0.2	0.997	0.994		0.995
					0.4	0.1	0.896	0.909		0.903
						0.2	0.966	0.963		0.955
Mean							0.785	0.797		0.785

^aEmpirical power under a fixed K.

^bEmpirical power under a varying K ~ U(a,b) following a uniform distribution with mean equal to the corresponding fixed K.