Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 17.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun 6;25(9):2716–2720. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4612-3

Table 1.

Comparison of twin cases and controls

T2D cases Controls Total p value
N 63 (6.6 %) 893 (93.4 %) 956
Females 61 (6.4 %) 856 (89.5 %) 917 (95.9 %) 0.71
Age (SD) years 59.4 (7.3) 53.6 (8.3) 53.9 (8.4) <0.001
BMI (SD) kg/m2 27.3 (5.2) 24.6 (4.1) 24.7 (4.3) <0.001
Smoking
  Non 31 (3.2 %) 422 (44.1 %) 453 (47.4 %)
  Ex 21 (2.2 %) 246 (25.7 %) 267 (27.9 %) 0.49
  Current 7 (0.7 %) 124 (13.0 %) 133 (13.7 %)
Alcohol 2.4 (SD = 1.2) 2.8 (SD = 1.4) 2.8 (SD = 1.4) 0.03
Zygosity
  MZ 28 (2.9 %) 290 (30.3 %) 318 (33.3 %) 0.05
  DZ 35 (3.7 %) 603 (63.1 %) 638 (66.7 %)
LDD score 14.9 (SD = 6.5) 13.1 (SD = 7.7) 13.2 (SD = 7.7) 0.04

The LDD score is the summation of four features (disc height, disc signal intensity, disc bulge and anterior osteophytes) each coded 0–3, summed over the five lumbar discs. Alcohol consumption was by self-report, averaged over one week in a lifetime, in alcohol units