Table 1.
Definition | Consensus statement regarding definition |
---|---|
General definitions | |
Focal therapy (FT) | An anatomy-based (zonal) treatment strategy (e.g. targeting a quadrant, a lobe or both lobes sub-totally) |
Targeted FT | A lesion-based focal treatment strategy targeting the identified tumors plus a safety margin |
The aim of (targeted) FT for PCa | Eradication of all significant cancer(s) |
Subtotal ablation | Any ablation where less than the whole gland is treated |
Extended-hemiablation | An ablation where one lobe is completely treated plus a margin of the other lobe regardless of shape |
Index lesion | The single dominant lesion in terms of grade and size where grade is more important. There can be only 1 index lesion. The term index lesion itself may be of limited use in the context of FT. It is more important to have an overview of all significant lesions that warrant treatment rather than a single defined index lesion |
Salvage FT | Salvage FT refers to the situation where FT is applied to the prostate after whole-gland therapy, or in the same region of the prostate as previous FT. The prostate gland has to be in place |
Success and failure in focal therapy | |
Ablation failure | Ablation failure is a failure of the technique to destroy the tissue in the treated zone, evidenced by tumor found within the treated zone. Ablation failure is just one of the causes that can lead to failure of FT as a whole. Other types of failure include targeting failure and selection failure. Must be confirmed by targeted biopsy |
Radiographic suspicion of ablation failure | A suspicion on imaging of tumor presence within the treated zone. mpMRI a suitable imaging modality to determine ablation failure |
Residual disease | Cancer remaining in the target zone after FT |
Selection failure | FT was inappropriately indicated, evidenced by short-term post-treatment identification of metastatic or locally advanced disease. There is no agreement on whether significant PCa in short-term biopsies taken inside or outside the treatment zone and the need for whole-gland treatment during follow-up constitute selection failure |
Biochemical progression after targeted FT | PSA is the best marker to monitor the disease after targeted FT. However, there is currently no data on how to use PSA, i.e. there is no data to support any of the definitions for biochemical recurrence in the context of (targeted) FT |
Pathological progression | An increase in Gleason score or tumor volume evidenced by a larger number of positive biopsies or larger per-core tumor involvement |
Baseline and outcome functional measures | |
Functional success of FT | The maintenance of voiding pattern, erectile function and quality of life assessed after 12 months |
Erectile function | A qualitative definition of impotency exists: the persistent inability to attain and maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance. For reporting research the panel recommends defining significant erectile dysfunction using the IIEF-5 score <21, determined at 1 year |
Sexually active | Patient-reported regular sexual activity |
Urinary incontinence | The need to use pads or patient-reported leakage. More comprehensive data could be gathered by requesting patients to complete a micturition diary including the parameters: number of pads, leakage and urge |
Significant deterioration of urinary function | An increase in IPSS >5 points |
Quality of life | A quality-of-life questionnaire should be administered and both the UCLA-EPIC and the EORTC-QLQ-c-30 tools can be used although neither one is validated for the specific context of focal therapy |
Bowel toxicity/GI side effects | The occurrence of: a change in stool frequency, fistula formation, soiling and/or blood in the stool after FT should constitute bowel toxicity/GI side effects. There is no consensus on whether mucus in the stool should also be included. The use of one of the existing grading systems for bowel toxicity is recommended |
Intraoperative complications | Complications that cause damage to the patients’ health or require intervention to prevent damage |
Short-term side effects | Side effects within 90 days of the procedure |
Serious side effects | Clavien–Dindo-scale with 3 or greater as “serious” side effects |
Procedural outcomes | |
Procedure time | From the completion of anesthetic induction until the treating physician is finished |
Hospital stay | The time from admittance until discharge |
FT in day-care | Admittance, treatment and discharge on the same day |
Catheterization time | The time from inserting the catheter until its removal, including time spent on the OR and the recovery-unit |
All statements were accepted with >80 % consensus unless stated other otherwise