Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 19;6:33524. doi: 10.1038/srep33524

Table 3. The volume and mass inhibition of hepatoma in nude mice after different treatments.

Group Tumor volume inhibition rate (%, mean ± s, n = 5) Tumor mass inhibition rate (%, mean ± s, n = 5)
Adriamycin group 76.66 ± 5.362,4,5 77.23 ± 3.84b,e
nuclide-alone group 35.73 ± 11.601,3,4,5 37.50 ± 11.38a,c,d,e
MFH-alone group 78.11 ± 6.822,4,5 76.67 ± 7.41b,e
nuclide-gene group 68.07 ± 6.141,2,3,5 75.58 ± 4.43b,e
nuclide-gene-MFH group 96.38 ± 1.561,2,3,4 94.17 ± 3.12a,b,c,d

Tumor volume inhibition rate: 1p < 0.05 versus adriamycin group; 2p < 0.001 versus nuclide-alone group; 3p < 0.001 versus MFH-alone group; 4p < 0.05 versus nuclide-gene group; 5p < 0.001 versus nuclide-gene-MFH group. Tumor mass inhibition rate: a p < 0.05 versus adriamycin control group; bp < 0.001 versus nuclide-alone group; cp < 0.05 versus MFH-alone group; dp < 0.05 versus nuclide-gene group; ep < 0.001 versus nuclide-gene-MFH group. These measurements were obtained after treatment for 6 weeks.