Table 3. The volume and mass inhibition of hepatoma in nude mice after different treatments.
Group | Tumor volume inhibition rate (%, mean ± s, n = 5) | Tumor mass inhibition rate (%, mean ± s, n = 5) |
---|---|---|
Adriamycin group | 76.66 ± 5.362,4,5 | 77.23 ± 3.84b,e |
nuclide-alone group | 35.73 ± 11.601,3,4,5 | 37.50 ± 11.38a,c,d,e |
MFH-alone group | 78.11 ± 6.822,4,5 | 76.67 ± 7.41b,e |
nuclide-gene group | 68.07 ± 6.141,2,3,5 | 75.58 ± 4.43b,e |
nuclide-gene-MFH group | 96.38 ± 1.561,2,3,4 | 94.17 ± 3.12a,b,c,d |
Tumor volume inhibition rate: 1p < 0.05 versus adriamycin group; 2p < 0.001 versus nuclide-alone group; 3p < 0.001 versus MFH-alone group; 4p < 0.05 versus nuclide-gene group; 5p < 0.001 versus nuclide-gene-MFH group. Tumor mass inhibition rate: a p < 0.05 versus adriamycin control group; bp < 0.001 versus nuclide-alone group; cp < 0.05 versus MFH-alone group; dp < 0.05 versus nuclide-gene group; ep < 0.001 versus nuclide-gene-MFH group. These measurements were obtained after treatment for 6 weeks.