Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 6;27(5):1343–1352. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arw053

Table 1.

Results of EHA on risk of dispersal (n = 29927 person-years for 1544 adult women aged 15 years and over and 31350 for 1651 adult men aged 15 years and over; 375 events for women, and 264 for men)

Female Male
Dispersal Estimate (SE) Hazard ratio P Estimate (SE) Hazard ratio P
Mother (alive as references category)
 Dead −0.019 (0.158) 0.982 0.906 0.332 (0.146) 1.393 0.023
Father (alive as references category)
 Dead 0.142 (0.125) 1.153 0.254 −0.042 (0.14) 0.959 0.763
Adult brother number 0.102 (0.04) 1.107 0.01 0.094 (0.048) 1.099 0.048
Adult sister number 0.119 (0.037) 1.127 0.001 −0.010 (0.047) 0.99 0.823
Birth cohort (<1940 as references category)
 1940 0.255 (0.388) 1.290 0.511 0.682 (0.366) 1.977 0.062
 1950 0.441 (0.329) 1.554 0.180 0.41 (0.354) 1.507 0.247
 1960 0.698 (0.309) 2.010 0.024 0.663 (0.342) 1.941 0.052
 1970 0.902 (0.308) 2.464 0.003 0.473 (0.35) 1.605 0.177
 1980–1997 0.937 (0.325) 2.553 0.004 −0.626 (0.466) 0.535 0.179
Constant 14.811 (1.305) 0 <0.001 15.117 (1.906) 0 <0.001

We used complementary log–log regression with dispersal (dispersed = 1, stay = 0) as dependent variable. The predictors used in the model are mother dead; father dead as time-varying variables; and adult brother number, adult sister number, and birth cohort as time-invariant variables. Sibling numbers only counted those from the same mother, as it is usually mother’s children who live in the same household; sibling numbers were time-invariant variables, due to timing of leaving home (if ever) not being known for everyone. Significant effects are indicated in bold. SE, standard error.