Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 23;10:28. doi: 10.14444/3028

Table 3.

Six-month success rates and subgroup analysis. Each cell shows number of successes / number treated, success rate and 95% posterior credible intervals in parentheses.

Subgroup Level SIJ Fusion NSM Rate Difference*
Diagnosis Degenerative sacroiliitis 71/88, 80.7%
(70.9-88.3%)
11/40, 27.5%
(14.6-43.9%)
52.3%
(35.6-67.2%)
Sacroiliac joint disruption 13/14, 92.9%
(66.1-99.8%)
1/6, 16.7%
(0.4-64.1%)
68.5%
(31.0-93.1%)
History of lumbar fusion Yes 35/41, 85.4%
(70.8-94.4%)
3/17, 17.6%
(3.8-43.4%)
65.1%
(41.8-83.0%)
No 49/61, 80.3%
(68.2-89.4%)
9/29, 31.0%
(15.3-50.8%)
48.2%
(28.0-66.1%)
Smoking Current 20/26, 76.9%
(56.4-91.0%)
1/3, 33.3%
(0.8-90.6%)
38.5%
(0-76.7%)
Never 39/46, 84.8%
(71.1-93.7%)
7/30, 23.3%
(9.9-42.3%)
59.8%
(40.4-76.4%)
Former 25/30, 83.3%
(65.3-94.4%)
4/13, 30.8%
(9.1-61.4%)
50.1%
(21.2-74.7%)
Bilateral pain Yes 28/36, 77.8%
(60.8-89.9%)
2/12, 16.7%
(2.1-48.4%)
57.8%
(30.1-78.8%)
No 56/66, 84.8%
(73.9-92.5%)
10/34, 29.4%
(15.1-47.5%)
54.3%
(36.1-70.5%)
All 84/102, 82.4%
(73.6-89.2%)
12/46, 26.1%
(14.3-41.1%)
55.4%
(40.1-69.1%)
*

Point estimate (95% posterior credible interval).