Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep;111(9):551–558. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760160116

TABLE II. Antimicrobial resistance rates among Pseudomona aeruginosa isolates of the present study and those previously described (Pellegrino et al. 2002).

Antimicrobial agent Number and (%) of resistant isolates

Clinical isolates Environmental isolates from present study (2007-2008) n = 17

Present study (2007-2008) n = 88a Pellegrino et al. (2002) (1999-2000) n = 115b
Amikacin 16 (18.2) 41 (35.6)* 5 (29.4)
Cefepime 33 (37.5) 47 (41.0) 3 (17.6)
Ceftazidime 33 (37.5) 42 (36.5) 5 (29.4)
Ciprofloxacin 30 (34.1) 49 (43.0) 9 (52.9)
Gentamicin 30 (34.1) 55 (48.0) 7 (41.2)
Imipenem 31 (35.2) - 27 (30.7)c 44 (38.3) 4 (23.5)
Meropenem 24 (27.3) -20 (22.7)c 35 (30.4) 1 (5.9)
Piperacillin-tazobactam 32 (36.4) - 25 (28.4)c 42 (36.5) 0
Tobramycin 29 (33.0) Not tested 8 (47.0)

One isolate with resistance to the greatest number of antimicrobial agents was selected per patient from a total of 225a or 200b; all isolates were susceptible to colistin (minimum inhibitory concentration < 2 μg/mL). Data for interpretation with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (NCCLS) 1999 are presented in c; *: comparison between clinical isolates exhibited p = 0.01; other comparisons were p-values > 0.06.