Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 14;8:457–465. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S113633

Table 1.

Model framework and clinical parameters

Parameter Base case value (sensitivity analysis [range]) Reference
Model framework
Time horizon (years) 6 (1–6) 15,16
Size of cohort Per patient
Per 1,000 patients
NA
Payer mix
 Private payer (%) 51.5 (0–100) 26,27
 Medicaid (%) 48.5 (0–100)
Discount rate (% per annum) 3.00 (0.00–5.00) 14
TGR lengthening setting of care
 Hospital outpatient/inpatient (%) 45.8 (0.0–100.0)/54.2 (0.0–100.0)
 Hospital inpatient 1-day short stay (%) 55.5 22
 Hospital inpatient standard ward (%) 35.2
 Hospital inpatient ICU (%) 9.3 Clinical practice dataa
MCGR lengthening setting of care
 Physician office (%) 100.0 b
Device failures and SSIs
TGR device failure (% per month) 0.59 (0.20–1.26) 15,16
MCGR device failure (% per month) 0.37 (0.00–0.59)
Device failures requiring complete removal (vs partial) (%) 5.8 (2.9–11.6) 18b
SSI (% per invasive surgery) 2.34 (1.17–4.68) 18
Deep SSI (vs superficial) (%) 68 (34–100) 7,8,18,2835
Other risk factors
Device failure: single rods (vs dual rods), RR 2.64 (1.32–5.28) 18
SSI: Medicaid patients (vs all other patients), RR 2.06 (1.19–3.58) 36

Notes:

a

Estimate based on experience at one facility where three of 41 patients (conservatively, ~5%) had an ICU stay, whereby half were undergoing the lengthening on an inpatient basis and the other half on an outpatient basis.

b

Clinical advisors.

Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; MCGR, magnetically controlled growing rod; NA, not applicable; RR, relative risk; SSI, surgical site infection; TGR, traditional growing rod.