Table 2.
Comparison between mass spectrometry and NMR as it applies to metabolomics research
| Mass Spectrometry | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | ≥ pM concentrations | ≥ μM concentrations |
| Sample preparation | Minimal to extensive: deproteinization, derivatization possibly required for targeted studies | Minimal: addition of a buffered deuterium oxide solution, deproteinization optional |
| Sample volume | On the order of 10 μL | On the order of 100 μL or more |
| =Quantification | Relative concentrations are most common, absolute quantification requires internal chemical standard at known concentration for each metabolite | Absolute concentrations are standard; internal chemical standard at known concentration routinely added during sample preparation (44) |
| Chromatography? | Yes, either liquid or gas chromatography used prior to injection into the instrument | Not common |
| Sample recovered? | No: principle relies on fragmentation of molecules and physical interaction with the instrument | Yes: principle relies on nuclear spin, a fundamental property of certain nuclei, and excitation/emission of photons is nondestructive |
| Quality control | Inter- and intra-batch variability requires periodically testing a set of standards and correcting for changes in sensitivity over time after data collection | Not required |
| Global | Yes, but requires quality control and instrument expertise | Yes |
| Targeted: endogenous | Highly sensitive and specific | Depends on the location of the resonance peaks in the spectrum |
| Targeted: exogenous | Yes | Depends, and NMR-active isotopes (13C or 15N) at low natural abundance are helpful |