Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2016 Aug 10;27(4):465–472. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2016.05.006

Table 2.

Comparison between mass spectrometry and NMR as it applies to metabolomics research

Mass Spectrometry NMR
Sensitivity ≥ pM concentrations ≥ μM concentrations
Sample preparation Minimal to extensive: deproteinization, derivatization possibly required for targeted studies Minimal: addition of a buffered deuterium oxide solution, deproteinization optional
Sample volume On the order of 10 μL On the order of 100 μL or more
=Quantification Relative concentrations are most common, absolute quantification requires internal chemical standard at known concentration for each metabolite Absolute concentrations are standard; internal chemical standard at known concentration routinely added during sample preparation (44)
Chromatography? Yes, either liquid or gas chromatography used prior to injection into the instrument Not common
Sample recovered? No: principle relies on fragmentation of molecules and physical interaction with the instrument Yes: principle relies on nuclear spin, a fundamental property of certain nuclei, and excitation/emission of photons is nondestructive
Quality control Inter- and intra-batch variability requires periodically testing a set of standards and correcting for changes in sensitivity over time after data collection Not required
Global Yes, but requires quality control and instrument expertise Yes
Targeted: endogenous Highly sensitive and specific Depends on the location of the resonance peaks in the spectrum
Targeted: exogenous Yes Depends, and NMR-active isotopes (13C or 15N) at low natural abundance are helpful